[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu v2] slirp/debug: Print IP addresses in huma
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu v2] slirp/debug: Print IP addresses in human readable form |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Mar 2018 08:44:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) |
Alexey Kardashevskiy, on mar. 13 mars 2018 15:49:44 +1100, wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>
Applied to my tree, thanks!
> ---
>
> checkpatch.pl complains on every single changed line as it keeps
> using tabs - do I need to post 's/\t/ /g'?
>
> ---
> Changes:
> v2:
> * replaced static cast to (in_addr*) with temporary structs
> ---
> slirp/arp_table.c | 4 ++--
> slirp/socket.c | 8 ++++----
> slirp/udp.c | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/slirp/arp_table.c b/slirp/arp_table.c
> index 3547043..f81963b 100644
> --- a/slirp/arp_table.c
> +++ b/slirp/arp_table.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ void arp_table_add(Slirp *slirp, uint32_t ip_addr, uint8_t
> ethaddr[ETH_ALEN])
> int i;
>
> DEBUG_CALL("arp_table_add");
> - DEBUG_ARG("ip = 0x%x", ip_addr);
> + DEBUG_ARG("ip = %s", inet_ntoa((struct in_addr){.s_addr = ip_addr}));
> DEBUG_ARGS((dfd, " hw addr = %02x:%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x\n",
> ethaddr[0], ethaddr[1], ethaddr[2],
> ethaddr[3], ethaddr[4], ethaddr[5]));
> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ bool arp_table_search(Slirp *slirp, uint32_t ip_addr,
> int i;
>
> DEBUG_CALL("arp_table_search");
> - DEBUG_ARG("ip = 0x%x", ip_addr);
> + DEBUG_ARG("ip = %s", inet_ntoa((struct in_addr){.s_addr = ip_addr}));
>
> /* If broadcast address */
> if (ip_addr == 0xffffffff || ip_addr == broadcast_addr) {
> diff --git a/slirp/socket.c b/slirp/socket.c
> index cb7b5b6..318301f 100644
> --- a/slirp/socket.c
> +++ b/slirp/socket.c
> @@ -701,10 +701,10 @@ tcp_listen(Slirp *slirp, uint32_t haddr, u_int hport,
> uint32_t laddr,
> memset(&addr, 0, addrlen);
>
> DEBUG_CALL("tcp_listen");
> - DEBUG_ARG("haddr = %x", haddr);
> - DEBUG_ARG("hport = %d", hport);
> - DEBUG_ARG("laddr = %x", laddr);
> - DEBUG_ARG("lport = %d", lport);
> + DEBUG_ARG("haddr = %s", inet_ntoa((struct in_addr){.s_addr = haddr}));
> + DEBUG_ARG("hport = %d", ntohs(hport));
> + DEBUG_ARG("laddr = %s", inet_ntoa((struct in_addr){.s_addr = laddr}));
> + DEBUG_ARG("lport = %d", ntohs(lport));
> DEBUG_ARG("flags = %x", flags);
>
> so = socreate(slirp);
> diff --git a/slirp/udp.c b/slirp/udp.c
> index 227d779..e5bf065 100644
> --- a/slirp/udp.c
> +++ b/slirp/udp.c
> @@ -241,8 +241,8 @@ int udp_output(struct socket *so, struct mbuf *m,
> DEBUG_CALL("udp_output");
> DEBUG_ARG("so = %p", so);
> DEBUG_ARG("m = %p", m);
> - DEBUG_ARG("saddr = %lx", (long)saddr->sin_addr.s_addr);
> - DEBUG_ARG("daddr = %lx", (long)daddr->sin_addr.s_addr);
> + DEBUG_ARG("saddr = %s", inet_ntoa(saddr->sin_addr));
> + DEBUG_ARG("daddr = %s", inet_ntoa(daddr->sin_addr));
>
> /*
> * Adjust for header
> --
> 2.11.0
>
--
Samuel
"I don't know why, but first C programs tend to look a lot worse than
first programs in any other language (maybe except for fortran, but then
I suspect all fortran programs look like `firsts')"
(By Olaf Kirch)