qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] make vm-test [was: [PATCH] maintainers: Add myself as a


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] make vm-test [was: [PATCH] maintainers: Add myself as a OpenBSD maintainer]
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:14:10 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0

On 03/21/2018 03:11 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
Thanks for this; today was my first day trying the various vm-build-
targets.

Question: is this expected behavior?

$ make vm-build-ubuntu.i386
     VM-IMAGE ubuntu.i386
...
Image resized.
debconf: unable to initialize frontend: Dialog
debconf: (TERM is not set, so the dialog frontend is not usable.)


I'm wondering if the image initialized incorrectly, and as a result can't do
as much as it's supposed to do, or runs way slower than it needs to?  The
command eventually completed with status 0, but failed to find a 32-bit
compile error in the rdma code, and the output log does not look like it
actually attempted to compile anything in qemu (unless it did compile it,
but the logs were not output to stdout/stderr).

make vm-build-freebsd was a lot faster at completing for me (but shows that
we still have a lot of clang warnings about address of a packed struct
member).


Was it a clean repo? Did you try "rm -rf ~/.cache/qemu-vm"? This morning the
command worked for me from a clean env (on RHEL 7, using a QEMU built from
qemu.git), and I didn't see the errors/warnings you pasted. (BTW I don't
understand how sudo has anything to do with the dummy host name.)

I repeated the test twice this morning after 'rm -rf ~/.cache/qemu-vm', first after 'rm tests/vm/ubuntu.i386.img' in an incremental tree, and second in a fresh git checkout. Here's a full pastebin of the first try (I hit ^C after seeing it look the same as yesterday, even after the fresh redownload that took more than 10 minutes):
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/p8Th7AroLAprGY03ffzGHA

The results are the same; debconf is somehow unable to connect to the guest, and as a result, the guest is not properly initialized with the additional packages it needs, and then everything else about the image is broken.

Then on the second try, I got a dreaded message about my /home being nearly full, (having multiple .img files in two different build directories pushed me over limits), and it died a much harder death due to ENOSPC. Let me resize my /home and retry (thankfully I still have some disk space free to throw at the problem), and I'll report back if that makes a difference.

--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]