qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] intel-iommu: nested vIOMMU, cleanups, bug


From: Peter Xu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] intel-iommu: nested vIOMMU, cleanups, bug fixes
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:34:57 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:05:14PM -0700, address@hidden wrote:

[...]

> === OUTPUT BEGIN ===
> Checking PATCH 1/10: intel-iommu: send PSI always even if across PDEs...
> Checking PATCH 2/10: intel-iommu: remove IntelIOMMUNotifierNode...
> Checking PATCH 3/10: intel-iommu: add iommu lock...
> Checking PATCH 4/10: intel-iommu: only do page walk for MAP notifiers...
> Checking PATCH 5/10: intel-iommu: introduce vtd_page_walk_info...
> Checking PATCH 6/10: intel-iommu: pass in address space when page walk...
> Checking PATCH 7/10: util: implement simple interval tree logic...
> WARNING: architecture specific defines should be avoided
> #34: FILE: include/qemu/interval-tree.h:11:
> +#ifndef __INTERVAL_TREE_H__

This is valid; I'll remove __ prefix/suffix and it'll fix.

> 
> ERROR: space prohibited between function name and open parenthesis '('
> #56: FILE: include/qemu/interval-tree.h:33:
> +typedef gboolean (*it_tree_iterator)(ITValue start, ITValue end);

While this is not; We possibly need the gboolean type into type list.
I'll post a standalone patch for checkpatch instead.

> 
> total: 1 errors, 1 warnings, 352 lines checked
> 
> Your patch has style problems, please review.  If any of these errors
> are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
> CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
> 
> Checking PATCH 8/10: intel-iommu: maintain per-device iova ranges...
> Checking PATCH 9/10: intel-iommu: don't unmap all for shadow page table...
> Checking PATCH 10/10: intel-iommu: remove notify_unmap for page walk...
> === OUTPUT END ===
> 
> Test command exited with code: 1
> 
> 
> ---
> Email generated automatically by Patchew [http://patchew.org/].
> Please send your feedback to address@hidden

-- 
Peter Xu



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]