qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/13] tests: Add qdict_stringify_for_keyval() t


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/13] tests: Add qdict_stringify_for_keyval() test
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 11:02:05 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0

On 05/09/2018 11:55 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <address@hidden>
---
  tests/check-qdict.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)


+static void qdict_stringify_for_keyval_test(void)
+{
+    QDict *dict = qdict_new();
+
+    /*
+     * Test stringification of:
+     *
+     * {
+     *     "a": "null",
+     *     "b": 42,
+     *     "c": -23,
+     *     "d": false,
+     *     "e": null,
+     *     "f": "",
+     *     "g": 0.5,
+     *     "h": 0xffffffffffffffff,
+     *     "i": true,
+     *     "j": 0

Is it worth testing fun things like '-0.0'?


+    g_assert(!strcmp(qdict_get_str(dict, "a"), "null"));
+    g_assert(!strcmp(qdict_get_str(dict, "b"), "42"));
+    g_assert(!strcmp(qdict_get_str(dict, "c"), "-23"));
+    g_assert(!strcmp(qdict_get_str(dict, "d"), "off"));
+    g_assert(qobject_type(qdict_get(dict, "e")) == QTYPE_QNULL);

Is it worth shortening this line to:
g_assert(qobject_to(QNull, qdict_get(dict, "e")));

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>

--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]