[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 7/9] i386: Add support for CPUID_8000_001E fo
From: |
Moger, Babu |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 7/9] i386: Add support for CPUID_8000_001E for AMD |
Date: |
Mon, 14 May 2018 23:49:42 +0000 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eduardo Habkost [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 4:12 PM
> To: Moger, Babu <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden;
> address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden;
> address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 7/9] i386: Add support for
> CPUID_8000_001E for AMD
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 07:16:07PM -0400, Babu Moger wrote:
> > Populate threads/core_id/apic_ids/socket_id when CPUID_EXT3_TOPOEXT
> > feature is supported. This is required to support hyperthreading feature
> > on AMD CPUs. This is supported via CPUID_8000_001E extended functions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <address@hidden>
> > Tested-by: Geoffrey McRae <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > target/i386/cpu.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > index 63f2d31..24b39c6 100644
> > --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> > +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > @@ -315,6 +315,12 @@ static uint32_t
> encode_cache_cpuid80000005(CPUCacheInfo *cache)
> > (((CORES_IN_CMPLX - 1) * 2) + 1) : \
> > (CORES_IN_CMPLX - 1))
> >
> > +/* Definitions used on CPUID Leaf 0x8000001E */
> > +#define EXTENDED_APIC_ID(threads, socket_id, core_id, thread_id) \
> > + ((threads) ? \
> > + ((socket_id << 6) | (core_id << 1) | thread_id) :
> > \
> > + ((socket_id << 6) | core_id))
>
> Using the AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Volume 3 as
> reference below.
>
> The formula above assumes MNC = (2 ^ 6).
>
> The current code in QEMU sets ApicIdCoreIdSize
> (CPUID[0x80000008].ECX[bits 15:12]) to 0, which means MNC is
> calculated using the legacy method:
> MNC = CPUID Fn8000_0008_ECX[NC] + 1.
>
> The current code sets CPUID Fn8000_0008_ECX[NC] to:
> (cs->nr_cores * cs->nr_threads) - 1.
>
> This means we cannot hardcode MNC, and must calculate it based on
> nr_cores and nr_threads.
>
> Probably it's a good idea to fill ApicIdCoreIdSize if TOPOEXT is
> set, so we will know MNC will always be a power of 2 and the
> formula here will be compatible with the existing APIC ID
> calculation logic.
>
> Note that we already have a comment at the top of topology.h:
>
> * This code should be compatible with AMD's "Extended Method" described
> at:
> * AMD CPUID Specification (Publication #25481)
> * Section 3: Multiple Core Calcuation
> * as long as:
> * nr_threads is set to 1;
> * OFFSET_IDX is assumed to be 0;
> * CPUID Fn8000_0008_ECX[ApicIdCoreIdSize[3:0]] is set to
> apicid_core_width().
>
> So you can already use cpu->apic_id here as long as
> ApicIdCoreSize is set to apicid_core_width(). Probably
> compatibility with AMD methods will be kept even if
> nr_threads > 1, but I didn't confirm that.
>
> Actually, I strongly advise you use cpu->apic_id here. Otherwise
Yes. We should be able to use cpu->apic_id here. Thanks for pointing this out.
Will run more tests to confirm. Thanks
> the Extended APIC ID seen by the guest here won't match the APIC
> ID used everywhere else inside QEMU and KVM code.
>
>
> > +
> > /*
> > * Encode cache info for CPUID[0x80000006].ECX and
> CPUID[0x80000006].EDX
> > * @l3 can be NULL.
> > @@ -4098,6 +4104,14 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env,
> uint32_t index, uint32_t count,
> > break;
> > }
> > break;
> > + case 0x8000001E:
> > + assert(cpu->core_id <= 255);
> > + *eax = EXTENDED_APIC_ID((cs->nr_threads - 1),
> > + cpu->socket_id, cpu->core_id, cpu->thread_id);
> > + *ebx = (cs->nr_threads - 1) << 8 | cpu->core_id;
> > + *ecx = cpu->socket_id;
>
> Terminology is confusing here, so let's confirm this is really
> what we want to do:
> * ThreadsPerComputeUnit is set to nr_threads-1. Looks correct.
> * ComputeUnitId is being set to core_id. Is this really what we
> want?
> * NodesPerProcessor is being set to 0 (meaning 1 node per
> processor)
> * NodeId is being set to socket_id. Is this really right,
> considering that NodesPerProcessor is being set to 0?
Yes. You are right.
ComputeUnitId, NodesPerProcessor and core_id is not set correctly.
Let me study little bit and ask around here. Will respond again.
>
> If this is really what you intend to do, I'd like to see it
> better documented, to avoid confusion in the future.
>
> We could either add wrapper functions that make the logic more
> explicit (e.g. x86_cpu_node_id(), x86_cpu_nodes_per_processor(),
> etc.) or add comments explaining how the QEMU socket/core/thread
> abstractions are being mapped to the AMD
> socket/node/compute-unit/thread abstractions (also, how a
> "Logical CCX L3 complex" is mapped into the QEMU abstractions,
> here?)
>
>
> > + *edx = 0;
> > + break;
> > case 0xC0000000:
> > *eax = env->cpuid_xlevel2;
> > *ebx = 0;
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
> >
>
> --
> Eduardo