qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tests: Allow GTESTER_OPTIONS variable expansion


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tests: Allow GTESTER_OPTIONS variable expansion from command line
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 20:33:38 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0

On 23.05.2018 13:57, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> The gtester utility offers the "-p=TESTPATH" option to
> "only run test cases matching TESTPATH".  We already use
> a $GTESTER_OPTIONS variable.
> Use make variable expansion to allow qtest path matching
> from command line:
> 
>   $ time make check-qtest-arm GTESTER_OPTIONS="-p /arm/boot-serial"
>     GTESTER check-qtest-arm
> 
>   user 0m1.548s
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
> ---
> I am more interested in the "-s" option (exclude pattern) but
> can't have it working :(
> 
> i.e. "run all but qom/hmp":
> make check-qtest-arm GTESTER_OPTIONS="-s /arm/qom -s /arm/hmp"
> 
>  tests/Makefile.include | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/Makefile.include b/tests/Makefile.include
> index 3b9a5e31a2..b0ff3d988c 100644
> --- a/tests/Makefile.include
> +++ b/tests/Makefile.include
> @@ -870,7 +870,7 @@ tests/test-qga$(EXESUF): qemu-ga$(EXESUF)
>  tests/test-qga$(EXESUF): tests/test-qga.o $(qtest-obj-y)
>  
>  SPEED = quick
> -GTESTER_OPTIONS = -k $(if $(V),--verbose,-q)
> +GTESTER_OPTIONS += -k $(if $(V),--verbose,-q)
>  GCOV_OPTIONS = -n $(if $(V),-f,)
>  
>  # gtester tests, possibly with verbose output

"make check-help" says:

 Default options are -k and (for make V=1) --verbose; they can be
 changed with variable GTESTER_OPTIONS.

So if you change the behavior here to amend to the variable instead, I
think you should also adjust the help text. Not sure if it's a good
idea, though, there might be people who want to run without "-k" and
this can not be disabled anymore with your patch.

 Thomas



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]