qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] monitor: turn on Out-Of-Band by default again


From: Peter Xu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] monitor: turn on Out-Of-Band by default again
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 16:04:58 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13)

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 02:40:26PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> 
> 
> On 05/21/2018 10:13 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 05/21/2018 03:42 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
> >> We turned Out-Of-Band feature of monitors off for 2.12 release.  Now we
> >> try to turn that on again.
> > 
> > "try to turn" sounds weak, like you aren't sure of this patch.  If you
> > aren't sure, then why should we feel safe in applying it?  This text is
> > going in the permanent git history, so sound bold, rather than hesitant!
> > 
> > "We have resolved the issues from last time (commit 3fd2457d reverted by
> > commit a4f90923):
> > - issue 1 ...
> > - issue 2 ...
> > So now we are ready to enable advertisement of the feature by default"
> > 
> > with better descriptions of the issues that you fixed (I can think of at
> > least the fixes adding thread-safety to the current monitor, and fixing
> > early use of the monitor before qmp_capabilities completes; there may
> > also be other issues that you want to call out).
> > 
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <address@hidden>
> >> -- 
> >> Now OOB should be okay with all known tests (except iotest qcow2, since
> >> it is still broken on master),
> > 
> > Which tests are still failing for you?  Ideally, you can still
> > demonstrate that the tests not failing without this patch continue to
> > pass with this patch, even if you call out the tests that have known
> > issues to still be resolved.
> > 
> 
> Probably 91 and 169. If any others fail that's news to me.

I just gave it a shot on my workstation too (./check -qcow2):

Not run: 045 059 064 070 075 076 077 078 081 083 084 088 092 093 094 101 106 
109 113 116 119 123 128 131 135 136 146 148 149 160 162 171 173 175 199 207 210 
3
Failures: 087 188 189 198 206
Failed 5 of 167 tests

I'm testing against master, e609fa7.

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]