[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 2/5] migration: use bitmap_mutex in migration
From: |
Peter Xu |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 2/5] migration: use bitmap_mutex in migration_bitmap_clear_dirty |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Jun 2018 11:37:39 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) |
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 02:13:45PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> The bitmap mutex is used to synchronize threads to update the dirty
> bitmap and the migration_dirty_pages counter. This patch makes
> migration_bitmap_clear_dirty update the bitmap and counter under the
> mutex.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <address@hidden>
> CC: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <address@hidden>
> CC: Juan Quintela <address@hidden>
> CC: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> ---
> migration/ram.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> index 0e90efa..9a72b1a 100644
> --- a/migration/ram.c
> +++ b/migration/ram.c
> @@ -795,11 +795,14 @@ static inline bool
> migration_bitmap_clear_dirty(RAMState *rs,
> {
> bool ret;
>
> + qemu_mutex_lock(&rs->bitmap_mutex);
> ret = test_and_clear_bit(page, rb->bmap);
>
> if (ret) {
> rs->migration_dirty_pages--;
> }
> + qemu_mutex_unlock(&rs->bitmap_mutex);
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
Do we need the lock after all?
I see that we introduced this lock due to device hotplug at dd63169766
("migration: extend migration_bitmap", 2015-07-07), however now we
actually don't allow that to happen any more after commit b06424de62
("migration: Disable hotplug/unplug during migration", 2017-04-21).
I'm not sure whether it means that the lock is not needed now.
If so, this patch seems to be unecessary.
Regards,
--
Peter Xu
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 2/5] migration: use bitmap_mutex in migration_bitmap_clear_dirty,
Peter Xu <=