qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] linux-user: Implement signals for openrisc


From: Laurent Vivier
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] linux-user: Implement signals for openrisc
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 21:59:14 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0

Le 31/05/2018 à 06:18, Richard Henderson a écrit :
> All of the existing code was boilerplate from elsewhere,
> and would crash the guest upon the first signal.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
> ---
>  linux-user/openrisc/target_syscall.h |  23 +--
>  linux-user/openrisc/signal.c         | 210 +++++++++++----------------
>  linux-user/signal.c                  |   2 +-
>  target/openrisc/cpu.c                |   1 +
>  4 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 149 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/linux-user/openrisc/target_syscall.h 
> b/linux-user/openrisc/target_syscall.h
> index 03104f80af..f21fab3192 100644
> --- a/linux-user/openrisc/target_syscall.h
> +++ b/linux-user/openrisc/target_syscall.h
> @@ -2,26 +2,9 @@
>  #define OPENRISC_TARGET_SYSCALL_H
>  
>  struct target_pt_regs {
> -    union {
> -        struct {
> -            /* Named registers */
> -            uint32_t sr;       /* Stored in place of r0 */
> -            target_ulong sp;   /* r1 */
> -        };
> -        struct {
> -            /* Old style */
> -            target_ulong offset[2];
> -            target_ulong gprs[30];
> -        };
> -        struct {
> -            /* New style */
> -            target_ulong gpr[32];
> -        };
> -    };
> -    target_ulong pc;
> -    target_ulong orig_gpr11;   /* For restarting system calls */
> -    uint32_t syscallno;        /* Syscall number (used by strace) */
> -    target_ulong dummy;     /* Cheap alignment fix */
> +    abi_ulong gpr[32];
> +    abi_ulong pc;
> +    abi_ulong sr;
>  };

>From where is this coming from?

In linux/arch/openrisc/include/asm/ptrace.h, we have the definition you
remove.

Thanks,
Laurent



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]