Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 for-3.0] tests/libqtest: Improve kill_qemu()

[Richard Henderson]

On 07/23/2018 12:35 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> In kill_qemu() we have an assert that checks that the QEMU process
> didn't dump core:
>             assert(!WCOREDUMP(wstatus));
> 
> Unfortunately the WCOREDUMP macro here means the resulting message
> is not very easy to comprehend on at least some systems:
> 
> ahci-test: tests/libqtest.c:113: kill_qemu: Assertion `!(((__extension__ 
> (((union { __typeof(wstatus) __in; int __i; }) { .__in = (wstatus) }).__i))) 
> & 0x80)' failed.
> 
> and it doesn't identify what signal the process took.
> 
> Furthermore, we are NOT detecting EINTR (while EINTR shouldn't be
> happening if we didn't install signal handlers, it's still better
> to always be robust), and also want to log unexpected non-zero status
> that was not accompanied by a core dump.
> 
> Instead of using a raw assert, print the information in an
> easier to understand way:
> 
> /i386/ahci/sanity: tests/libqtest.c:119: kill_qemu() detected QEMU death with 
> core dump from signal 11 (Segmentation fault)
> Aborted (core dumped)
> 
> (Of course, the really useful information would be why the QEMU
> process dumped core in the first place, but we don't have that
> by the time the test program has picked up the exit status.)
> 
> Suggested-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
> ---
> 
> I've taken the ideas from Peter's patch:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-07/msg04430.html
> as well as fixing a related issue brought up last time this was touched:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-05/msg05710.html
> 
>  tests/libqtest.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>


r~