qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 for 3.0 00/18] docker fixes (and one tcg test


From: Fam Zheng
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 for 3.0 00/18] docker fixes (and one tcg test tweak)
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 17:09:34 +0800

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 4:56 PM Alex Bennée <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> Fam Zheng <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 6:03 PM Alex Bennée <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Alex Bennée <address@hidden> writes:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I've missed the boat for today's rc1 but I'd like to get this merged
> >> > before rc2. The new docker.py change is technically new functionality
> >> > but I'm counting it as a usability bug fix as it replaces a random
> >> > back trace failure with a preemptive failure and message mentioning
> >> > binfmt_misc configuration. This would have saved Richard a lot of head
> >> > scratching as he tried to setup a powerpc-user setup to test his
> >> > setcontext fix (he had a custom binfmt_misc pointing to his src tree).
> >> >
> >> > Finally we also drop the runcom test. It was cute that it got
> >> > resurrected but it is ultimately a pointless test for something I'm
> >> > sure no one actually uses.
> >> >
> >> > There will be a follow-up RFC series after this that cleans-up some of
> >> > the rough edges when your host is not an x86_64 box but that series
> >> > won't be targeting the 3.0 release.
> >> >
> >> > : The following patches need review
> >> > : patch docker/disable debian powerpc user cross.patch
> >> > : patch docker/drop QEMU_TARGET check fallback in EXECUTABLE.patch
> >> > : patch docker/Update debootstrap script after Debian migrat.patch
> >> > : patch docker/ignore distro versioning of debootstrap.patch
> >> > : patch docker/perform basic binfmt_misc validation in docke.patch
> >> > : patch tests/tcg remove runcom test.patch
> >>
> >> Ping?
> >
> > I had questions about patch 13 and 17. Otherwise looks good.
> > Maybe you can drop them for now (including patch 9) and send the PULL for
> > the rest.
>
> I can drop/replace 13 - but 17 was there for a better reporting of a
> failure case Peter found. We can certainly expand it and be smarter in
> future iterations.


Sounds good to me.

Fam

>
>
> > I don't know if we can catch up -rc2 but I guess the testing fixes are
> > fairly safe to sneak in. :)
> >
> > (My development machine is affected by
> > an
> >  office power outage, and I was
> > also
> >  busy with upgrading patchew.org. Sorry for the
> >
> > late reply
> > !)
> >
> > Fam
>
>
> --
> Alex Bennée



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]