qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] qstring: Assert size calculations don't ove


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] qstring: Assert size calculations don't overflow
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 09:04:51 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0

On 07/26/2018 01:18 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>
---
  qobject/qstring.c | 6 +++++-
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/qobject/qstring.c b/qobject/qstring.c
index 18b8eb82f8..7990569c5a 100644
--- a/qobject/qstring.c
+++ b/qobject/qstring.c
@@ -41,17 +41,19 @@ QString *qstring_from_substr(const char *str, size_t start, 
size_t end)
  {
      QString *qstring;
+ assert(start <= end + 1);

end + 1 can overflow size_t, but it is unsigned so well-defined, and the assert will trigger as desired.

@@ -68,7 +70,9 @@ QString *qstring_from_str(const char *str)
  static void capacity_increase(QString *qstring, size_t len)
  {
      if (qstring->capacity < (qstring->length + len)) {
+        assert(len <= SIZE_MAX - qstring->capacity);
          qstring->capacity += len;

You've asserted that this addition won't overflow...

+        assert(qstring->capacity + len <= SIZE_MAX / 2);

...but now that qstring->capacity is larger, this could overflow. Do you really need the +len in here, given that...

          qstring->capacity *= 2; /* use exponential growth */

...you are really only trying to prevent overflow of doubling qstring->capacity without adding yet another len in the mix?

--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]