qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] valgrind problem in sun4u_load_kernel()


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] valgrind problem in sun4u_load_kernel()
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 10:48:13 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0

On 06/19/2018 10:03 AM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 15/06/18 11:37, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>
>>>   Hi Mark, hi Artyom,
>>>
>>> while using valgrind to fix some issues with the rom_ptr() function
>>> today, I noticed that there is one more problem in sun4u_load_kernel():
>>> The kernel_top variable can be used uninitialized in some cases:
>>> If load_elf() fails and the kernel is loaded via load_aout() or
>>> load_image_targphys(), the kernel_top variable is never set to a valid
>>> value. This could cause some trouble when loading the initrd later. When
>>> you've got some spare time, could you please have a look?
>>
>>
>> Hmmm that's an interesting one - I'm not immediately aware of any 64-bit
>> kernels that are a.out rather than ELF, so I wonder if this has been used to
>> run a.out executables on startup? Any thoughts, Artyom?
> 
> I think there are no Linux/SPARC64 kernels in the a.out format.
> NetBSD should not be a problem either
> 
>> If this is the case then we can only have a valid kernel_top with an ELF
>> kernel then maybe the following is a good enough solution:
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/sparc64/sun4u.c b/hw/sparc64/sun4u.c
>> index 3975a7b65a..35acf8c96e 100644
>> --- a/hw/sparc64/sun4u.c
>> +++ b/hw/sparc64/sun4u.c
>> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static uint64_t sun4u_load_kernel(const char
>> *kernel_filename,
>>      unsigned int i;
>>      long kernel_size;
>>      uint8_t *ptr;
>> -    uint64_t kernel_top;
>> +    uint64_t kernel_top = 0;
>>
>>      linux_boot = (kernel_filename != NULL);
>>
>> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static uint64_t sun4u_load_kernel(const char
>> *kernel_filename,
>>          }
>>          /* load initrd above kernel */
>>          *initrd_size = 0;
>> -        if (initrd_filename) {
>> +        if (initrd_filename && kernel_top) {
>>              *initrd_addr = TARGET_PAGE_ALIGN(kernel_top);
>>
>>              *initrd_size = load_image_targphys(initrd_filename,
>>
>>
> Looks good to me.
> Acked-by: Artyom Tarasenko <address@hidden>

 Hi Mark,

that looked also fine to me. Could you post it as a proper patch, please?

 Thanks,
  Thomas



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]