qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] i386: fix handling of multiboot modules


From: Roman Kagan
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] i386: fix handling of multiboot modules
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:41:08 +0300
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 03:38:14PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 05:34:43PM +0300, Roman Kagan wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 02:23:09PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 08:11:58PM +0300, Roman Kagan wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 10:47:47AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > > > ping...
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 06:19:10PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > > > > This short series fixes a flaw identified by coverity which broke 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > handling of multiboot modules.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Daniel P. Berrangé (3):
> > > > > >   i386: fix regression parsing multiboot initrd modules
> > > > > >   i386: only parse the initrd_filename once for multiboot modules
> > > > > >   opts: remove redundant check for NULL parameter
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  hw/i386/multiboot.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
> > > > > >  util/qemu-option.c  |  8 +++-----
> > > > > >  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > -- 
> > > > > > 2.17.0
> > > > 
> > > > Any reason this hasn't been merged yet?
> > > 
> > > Lack of reviews, unfortunately.  I guess we don't have many
> > > people familiar with the multiboot code.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > This fixes a regression that, in particular, makes QEMU segfault when
> > > > running kvm-unit-tests.
> > > 
> > > As it is a bug fix, I will try to review merge it for the next
> > > rc.
> > 
> > Looks like it ended up missing 3.0, so kvm-unit-tests still segfault
> > with the released version of QEMU :(
> 
> Please check again, as I see it merged before 3.0:

Oh, you're right, I just ran the tests against a wrong QEMU.

It's OK now indeed.

Sorry for the noise,
Roman.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]