[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 8/8] Revert "hbitmap: Add @advance param to h
From: |
John Snow |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 8/8] Revert "hbitmap: Add @advance param to hbitmap_iter_next()" |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:53:51 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 |
On 08/14/2018 08:14 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> This reverts commit a33fbb4f8b64226becf502a123733776ce319b24.
>
> The functionality is unused.
>
> Note: in addition to automatic revert, drop second parameter in
> hbitmap_iter_next() call from hbitmap_next_dirty_area() too.
>
Hm, it's not really a "revert" in the revision control sense then, but I
don't think I care about that kind of pedantic distinction personally.
6,7,8: Reviewed-by: John Snow <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <address@hidden>
> ---
> include/qemu/hbitmap.h | 5 +----
> block/backup.c | 2 +-
> block/dirty-bitmap.c | 2 +-
> tests/test-hbitmap.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
> util/hbitmap.c | 12 ++++--------
> 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/qemu/hbitmap.h b/include/qemu/hbitmap.h
> index 7800317bf3..6d205167ce 100644
> --- a/include/qemu/hbitmap.h
> +++ b/include/qemu/hbitmap.h
> @@ -345,14 +345,11 @@ void hbitmap_free_meta(HBitmap *hb);
> /**
> * hbitmap_iter_next:
> * @hbi: HBitmapIter to operate on.
> - * @advance: If true, advance the iterator. Otherwise, the next call
> - * of this function will return the same result (if that
> - * position is still dirty).
> *
> * Return the next bit that is set in @hbi's associated HBitmap,
> * or -1 if all remaining bits are zero.
> */
> -int64_t hbitmap_iter_next(HBitmapIter *hbi, bool advance);
> +int64_t hbitmap_iter_next(HBitmapIter *hbi);
>
> /**
> * hbitmap_iter_next_word:
> diff --git a/block/backup.c b/block/backup.c
> index 9bfd3f7189..f033148f21 100644
> --- a/block/backup.c
> +++ b/block/backup.c
> @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn
> backup_run_incremental(BackupBlockJob *job)
> HBitmapIter hbi;
>
> hbitmap_iter_init(&hbi, job->copy_bitmap, 0);
> - while ((cluster = hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi, true)) != -1) {
> + while ((cluster = hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi)) != -1) {
> do {
> if (yield_and_check(job)) {
> return 0;
> diff --git a/block/dirty-bitmap.c b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
> index d9333175b3..d0d602ff52 100644
> --- a/block/dirty-bitmap.c
> +++ b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
> @@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ void bdrv_dirty_iter_free(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter)
>
> int64_t bdrv_dirty_iter_next(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter)
> {
> - return hbitmap_iter_next(&iter->hbi, true);
> + return hbitmap_iter_next(&iter->hbi);
> }
>
> /* Called within bdrv_dirty_bitmap_lock..unlock */
> diff --git a/tests/test-hbitmap.c b/tests/test-hbitmap.c
> index 5e43056970..17a3c807de 100644
> --- a/tests/test-hbitmap.c
> +++ b/tests/test-hbitmap.c
> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static void hbitmap_test_check(TestHBitmapData *data,
>
> i = first;
> for (;;) {
> - next = hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi, true);
> + next = hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi);
> if (next < 0) {
> next = data->size;
> }
> @@ -435,25 +435,25 @@ static void
> test_hbitmap_iter_granularity(TestHBitmapData *data,
> /* Note that hbitmap_test_check has to be invoked manually in this test.
> */
> hbitmap_test_init(data, 131072 << 7, 7);
> hbitmap_iter_init(&hbi, data->hb, 0);
> - g_assert_cmpint(hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi, true), <, 0);
> + g_assert_cmpint(hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi), <, 0);
>
> hbitmap_test_set(data, ((L2 + L1 + 1) << 7) + 8, 8);
> hbitmap_iter_init(&hbi, data->hb, 0);
> - g_assert_cmpint(hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi, true), ==, (L2 + L1 + 1) << 7);
> - g_assert_cmpint(hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi, true), <, 0);
> + g_assert_cmpint(hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi), ==, (L2 + L1 + 1) << 7);
> + g_assert_cmpint(hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi), <, 0);
>
> hbitmap_iter_init(&hbi, data->hb, (L2 + L1 + 2) << 7);
> - g_assert_cmpint(hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi, true), <, 0);
> + g_assert_cmpint(hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi), <, 0);
>
> hbitmap_test_set(data, (131072 << 7) - 8, 8);
> hbitmap_iter_init(&hbi, data->hb, 0);
> - g_assert_cmpint(hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi, true), ==, (L2 + L1 + 1) << 7);
> - g_assert_cmpint(hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi, true), ==, 131071 << 7);
> - g_assert_cmpint(hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi, true), <, 0);
> + g_assert_cmpint(hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi), ==, (L2 + L1 + 1) << 7);
> + g_assert_cmpint(hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi), ==, 131071 << 7);
> + g_assert_cmpint(hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi), <, 0);
>
> hbitmap_iter_init(&hbi, data->hb, (L2 + L1 + 2) << 7);
> - g_assert_cmpint(hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi, true), ==, 131071 << 7);
> - g_assert_cmpint(hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi, true), <, 0);
> + g_assert_cmpint(hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi), ==, 131071 << 7);
> + g_assert_cmpint(hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi), <, 0);
> }
>
> static void hbitmap_test_set_boundary_bits(TestHBitmapData *data, ssize_t
> diff)
> @@ -893,7 +893,7 @@ static void test_hbitmap_serialize_zeroes(TestHBitmapData
> *data,
> for (i = 0; i < num_positions; i++) {
> hbitmap_deserialize_zeroes(data->hb, positions[i], min_l1, true);
> hbitmap_iter_init(&iter, data->hb, 0);
> - next = hbitmap_iter_next(&iter, true);
> + next = hbitmap_iter_next(&iter);
> if (i == num_positions - 1) {
> g_assert_cmpint(next, ==, -1);
> } else {
> @@ -919,10 +919,10 @@ static void test_hbitmap_iter_and_reset(TestHBitmapData
> *data,
>
> hbitmap_iter_init(&hbi, data->hb, BITS_PER_LONG - 1);
>
> - hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi, true);
> + hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi);
>
> hbitmap_reset_all(data->hb);
> - hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi, true);
> + hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi);
> }
>
> static void test_hbitmap_next_zero_check_range(TestHBitmapData *data,
> diff --git a/util/hbitmap.c b/util/hbitmap.c
> index bf88c1223e..b00e05a85b 100644
> --- a/util/hbitmap.c
> +++ b/util/hbitmap.c
> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ unsigned long hbitmap_iter_skip_words(HBitmapIter *hbi)
> return cur;
> }
>
> -int64_t hbitmap_iter_next(HBitmapIter *hbi, bool advance)
> +int64_t hbitmap_iter_next(HBitmapIter *hbi)
> {
> unsigned long cur = hbi->cur[HBITMAP_LEVELS - 1] &
> hbi->hb->levels[HBITMAP_LEVELS - 1][hbi->pos];
> @@ -157,12 +157,8 @@ int64_t hbitmap_iter_next(HBitmapIter *hbi, bool advance)
> }
> }
>
> - if (advance) {
> - /* The next call will resume work from the next bit. */
> - hbi->cur[HBITMAP_LEVELS - 1] = cur & (cur - 1);
> - } else {
> - hbi->cur[HBITMAP_LEVELS - 1] = cur;
> - }
> + /* The next call will resume work from the next bit. */
> + hbi->cur[HBITMAP_LEVELS - 1] = cur & (cur - 1);
> item = ((uint64_t)hbi->pos << BITS_PER_LEVEL) + ctzl(cur);
>
> return item << hbi->granularity;
> @@ -256,7 +252,7 @@ bool hbitmap_next_dirty_area(const HBitmap *hb, uint64_t
> *offset,
> }
>
> hbitmap_iter_init(&hbi, hb, *offset);
> - off1 = hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi, true);
> + off1 = hbitmap_iter_next(&hbi);
>
> if (off1 < 0 || off1 >= end) {
> return false;
>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 8/8] Revert "hbitmap: Add @advance param to hbitmap_iter_next()",
John Snow <=