qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] target/mips: Add entries for the Toshiba's


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] target/mips: Add entries for the Toshiba's R3900 and R5900 cores
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 08:57:49 -0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0

Hi Aleksandar,

On 9/11/18 7:18 AM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
>> From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> on behalf of Philippe > 
>> Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
>> Sent: Sunday, September 9, 2018 3:34 AM
>> To: Fredrik Noring; Aleksandar Markovic
>> Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé; address@hidden; Richard Henderson; Aurelien Jarno
>> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] target/mips: Add entries for the Toshiba's R3900 and 
>> R5900 cores
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  target/mips/mips-defs.h | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/mips/mips-defs.h b/target/mips/mips-defs.h
>> index c8e99791ad..9875bdac82 100644
>> --- a/target/mips/mips-defs.h
>> +++ b/target/mips/mips-defs.h
>> @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@
>>  #define                INSN_LOONGSON2E  0x20000000
>>  #define                INSN_LOONGSON2F  0x40000000
>>  #define                INSN_VR54XX     0x80000000
>> +#define     INSN_R3900       0x100000000ULL
>> +#define     INSN_R5900       0x200000000ULL
>>
>>  /* MIPS CPU defines. */
>>  #define                CPU_MIPS1       (ISA_MIPS1)
> 
> I don't think we should add flags for not yet supported CPUs ot ASEs. 
> (Corresponding ELF flags in other headers are OK, since they originate from 
> external headers - however, "insn_flags" is a purely internal QEMU construct.)

OK. I added those definitions to avoid Fredrik's series clashing with my
work, but I'll adapt later.

> Instead, I would reorganize existing flags (as you, as well, indicated in a 
> previous message).

Good.

> Let's say, something like this:
> 
> 
> /*
>  * insn_flags
>  */
> 
> /*
>  * bits 0-31 MIPS base instruction sets
>  */ 
> #define ISA_MIPS1         0x0000000000000001
> #define ISA_MIPS2         0x0000000000000002
> #define ISA_MIPS3         0x0000000000000004
> #define ISA_MIPS4         0x0000000000000008
> #define ISA_MIPS5         0x0000000000000010
> #define ISA_MIPS32        0x0000000000000020
> #define ISA_MIPS32R2      0x0000000000000040
> #define ISA_MIPS64        0x0000000000000080
> #define ISA_MIPS64R2      0x0000000000000100
> #define ISA_MIPS32R3      0x0000000000000200
> #define ISA_MIPS64R3      0x0000000000000400
> #define ISA_MIPS32R5      0x0000000000000800
> #define ISA_MIPS64R5      0x0000000000001000
> #define ISA_MIPS32R6      0x0000000000002000
> #define ISA_MIPS64R6      0x0000000000004000
> #define ISA_NANOMIPS32    0x0000000000008000
> 
> /*
>  * bits 32-47 MIPS ASEs
>  */ 
> #define ASE_MIPS16        0x0000000100000000
> #define ASE_MIPS3D        0x0000000200000000
> #define ASE_MDMX          0x0000000400000000
> #define ASE_DSP           0x0000000800000000
> #define ASE_DSPR2         0x0000001000000000
> #define ASE_DSPR3         0x0000002000000000
> #define ASE_MT            0x0000004000000000
> #define ASE_SMARTMIPS     0x0000008000000000
> #define ASE_MICROMIPS     0x0000010000000000
> #define ASE_MSA           0x0000020000000000
> 
> /*
>  * bits 48-55 vendor-specific base instruction sets
>  */ 
> #define       INSN_LOONGSON2E   0x0001000000000000
> #define       INSN_LOONGSON2F   0x0002000000000000
> #define       INSN_VR54XX       0x0004000000000000
> 
> /*
>  * bits 56-63 vendor-specific ASEs
>  */ 

Yes, this is cleaner, I like it. Beware we have to add the ULL suffix.

> Notice that I inserted ASE_DSPR3, that was missing (there is an instruction 
> from DSP R3 already implemented, and needing this flag for correct 
> availability control.).

OK.

> INSN_R5900 would belong to the third category. ASE_MXU and ASE MXU2 (not yet 
> implemented in QEMU) from Igenic would be examples for the fourth category. 
> The fourth category would be empty for now.

OK, thanks for the review!

Phil.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]