qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/11] net: smc91c111: convert SysBus init metho


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/11] net: smc91c111: convert SysBus init method to a realize method
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:53:58 +0100

On 28 September 2018 at 16:10, Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 9/28/18 4:45 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 28 September 2018 at 14:50, Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>  void smc91c111_init(NICInfo *nd, uint32_t base, qemu_irq irq)
>>>  {
>>> -    DeviceState *dev;
>>> -    SysBusDevice *s;
>>> +    Object *obj;
>>>
>>>      qemu_check_nic_model(nd, "smc91c111");
>>> -    dev = qdev_create(NULL, TYPE_SMC91C111);
>>> -    qdev_set_nic_properties(dev, nd);
>>> -    qdev_init_nofail(dev);
>>> -    s = SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev);
>>> -    sysbus_mmio_map(s, 0, base);
>>> -    sysbus_connect_irq(s, 0, irq);
>>> +    obj = object_new(TYPE_SMC91C111);
>>> +    qdev_set_nic_properties(DEVICE(obj), nd);
>>> +    qdev_init_nofail(DEVICE(obj));
>>> +    sysbus_mmio_map(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(obj), 0, base);
>>> +    sysbus_connect_irq(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(obj), 0, irq);
>>
>> I'm not sure why you've changed this function as well?
>
> Initially to stop using the qdev_ routines but I ended up rewriting them
> with object_ routines and only kept the object_new() call.
>
> Shall I drop the change then ?

I would drop it, I think -- we're not really trying to get
rid of the qdev APIs. (I'm tending towards a style of not using
this sort of helper function and instead just embedding
devices directly in their users, but when we have a helper
function there's no particular need to avoid qdev_ calls in it.)

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]