Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] intel_iommu: handle invalid ce for shadow sync

[Auger Eric]

Hi Peter,
On 9/13/18 9:55 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
> There are two callers for vtd_sync_shadow_page_table_range(), one
> provided a valid context entry and one not.  Move that fetching
> operation into the caller vtd_sync_shadow_page_table() where we need to
> fetch the context entry.
> 
> Meanwhile, we should handle VTD_FR_CONTEXT_ENTRY_P properly when
> synchronizing shadow page tables.  Having invalid context entry there is
> perfectly valid when we move a device out of an existing domain.  When
> that happens, instead of posting an error we invalidate the whole region.
> 
> Without this patch, QEMU will crash if we do these steps:
> 
> (1) start QEMU with VT-d IOMMU and two 10G NICs (ixgbe)
> (2) bind the NICs with vfio-pci in the guest
> (3) start testpmd with the NICs applied
> (4) stop testpmd
> (5) rebind the NIC back to ixgbe kernel driver
> 
> The patch should fix it.
> 
> Reported-by: Pei Zhang <address@hidden>
> Tested-by: Pei Zhang <address@hidden>
> CC: Pei Zhang <address@hidden>
> CC: Alex Williamson <address@hidden>
> CC: Jason Wang <address@hidden>
> CC: Maxime Coquelin <address@hidden>
> CC: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> CC: QEMU Stable <address@hidden>
> Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627272
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> index 3dfada19a6..2509520d6f 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@
>  #include "kvm_i386.h"
>  #include "trace.h"
>  
> +static void vtd_address_space_unmap(VTDAddressSpace *as, IOMMUNotifier *n);
> +
>  static void vtd_define_quad(IntelIOMMUState *s, hwaddr addr, uint64_t val,
>                              uint64_t wmask, uint64_t w1cmask)
>  {
Comment above is outdated:
/* If context entry is NULL, we'll try to fetch it on our own. */
> @@ -1047,39 +1049,49 @@ static int 
> vtd_sync_shadow_page_table_range(VTDAddressSpace *vtd_as,
>          .notify_unmap = true,
>          .aw = s->aw_bits,
>          .as = vtd_as,
> +        .domain_id = VTD_CONTEXT_ENTRY_DID(ce->hi),
>      };
> -    VTDContextEntry ce_cache;
> +
> +    return vtd_page_walk(ce, addr, addr + size, &info);
> +}
Maybe change would gain in clarity if split into 2 patches, code
reorganization and fix on the side.

Thanks

Eric
> +
> +static int vtd_sync_shadow_page_table(VTDAddressSpace *vtd_as)
> +{
>      int ret;
> +    VTDContextEntry ce;
> +    IOMMUNotifier *n;
>  
> -    if (ce) {
> -        /* If the caller provided context entry, use it */
> -        ce_cache = *ce;
> -    } else {
> -        /* If the caller didn't provide ce, try to fetch */
> -        ret = vtd_dev_to_context_entry(s, pci_bus_num(vtd_as->bus),
> -                                       vtd_as->devfn, &ce_cache);
> -        if (ret) {
> +    ret = vtd_dev_to_context_entry(vtd_as->iommu_state,
> +                                   pci_bus_num(vtd_as->bus),
> +                                   vtd_as->devfn, &ce);
> +    if (ret) {
> +        if (ret == -VTD_FR_CONTEXT_ENTRY_P) {
> +            /*
> +             * It's a valid scenario to have a context entry that is
> +             * not present.  For example, when a device is removed
> +             * from an existing domain then the context entry will be
> +             * zeroed by the guest before it was put into another
> +             * domain.  When this happens, instead of synchronizing
> +             * the shadow pages we should invalidate all existing
> +             * mappings and notify the backends.
> +             */
> +            IOMMU_NOTIFIER_FOREACH(n, &vtd_as->iommu) {
> +                vtd_address_space_unmap(vtd_as, n);
> +            }
> +        } else {
>              /*
>               * This should not really happen, but in case it happens,
>               * we just skip the sync for this time.  After all we even
>               * don't have the root table pointer!
>               */
>              error_report_once("%s: invalid context entry for bus 0x%x"
> -                              " devfn 0x%x",
> -                              __func__, pci_bus_num(vtd_as->bus),
> -                              vtd_as->devfn);
> -            return 0;
> +                              " devfn 0x%x", __func__,
> +                              pci_bus_num(vtd_as->bus), vtd_as->devfn);
>          }
> +        return 0;
>      }
>  
> -    info.domain_id = VTD_CONTEXT_ENTRY_DID(ce_cache.hi);
> -
> -    return vtd_page_walk(&ce_cache, addr, addr + size, &info);
> -}
> -
> -static int vtd_sync_shadow_page_table(VTDAddressSpace *vtd_as)
> -{
> -    return vtd_sync_shadow_page_table_range(vtd_as, NULL, 0, UINT64_MAX);
> +    return vtd_sync_shadow_page_table_range(vtd_as, &ce, 0, UINT64_MAX);
>  }
>  
>  /*
>