qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 0/5] Dynamic TLB sizing


From: Emilio G. Cota
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 0/5] Dynamic TLB sizing
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 10:38:37 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)

On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 13:34:40 +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> 
> Emilio G. Cota <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > v1: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-10/msg01146.html
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> 
> Hmm I'm seeing some qtest failures, for example:
> 
>   $ make check-qtest-alpha V=1
>   ...
>   QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=alpha-softmmu/qemu-system-alpha QTEST_QEMU_IMG=qemu-img 
> MALLOC_PERTURB_=${MALLOC_PERTURB_:-$(( ${RANDOM:-0} % 255 + 1))} gtester -k 
> --verbose -m=quick test
>   s/boot-serial-test tests/qmp-test tests/qmp-cmd-test 
> tests/device-introspect-test tests/cdrom-test tests/machine-none-test 
> tests/qom-test tests/test-hmp
>   TEST: tests/boot-serial-test... (pid=31091)
>     /alpha/boot-serial/clipper:                                          
> Broken pipe
>   tests/libqtest.c:129: kill_qemu() detected QEMU death from signal 11 
> (Segmentation fault) (core dumped)
>   FAIL
>   GTester: last random seed: R02S948c4a5112fd7682934f4d96e1aff38e
>   (pid=31099)
>   FAIL: tests/boot-serial-test

I'm pretty sure that the problem is that tlb_init is not being
called at all. Note that this applies to the tlb-lock series
as well, although there we're just calling qemu_spin_init,
which is not really necessary because CPUArchState is 0-allocated.

I'll take a look.

Thanks,

                E.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]