qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/11] hw/m68k: add Apple Machintosh Quadra 8


From: Mark Cave-Ayland
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/11] hw/m68k: add Apple Machintosh Quadra 800 machine
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 11:48:26 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1

On 30/10/2018 08:15, Richard Henderson wrote:

> On 10/29/18 1:39 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>> You can install your own disk using debian-installer, with:
>>
>>     ...
>>     -M q800 \
>>     -serial none -serial mon:stdio \
>>     -m 1000M -drive file=m68k.qcow2,format=qcow2 \
>>     -net nic,model=dp83932,addr=09:00:07:12:34:57 \
>>     -append "console=ttyS0 vga=off" \
>>     -kernel vmlinux-4.15.0-2-m68k \
>>     -initrd initrd.gz \
>>     -drive file=debian-9.0-m68k-NETINST-1.iso \
>>     -drive file=m68k.qcow2,format=qcow2 \
>>     -nographic
> 
> I tried this and got
> 
> Trace 0: 0x7f2e886c7140 [00000000/0000d404/0xe000]
> INT      1: Unassigned(0xf4) pc=0000d404 sp=00393e60 sr=2700
> INT      2: Access Fault(0x8) pc=00000000 sp=00393e58 sr=2700
>             ssw:  00000506 ea:   00000000 sfc:  5    dfc: 5
> 
> which lead straight to buserr and panic.  This happens way early in boot --
> only 1926 TranslationBlocks generated.
> 
> Is there some device missing from the command-line that the kernel is 
> expecting?

Heh that's annoying. The original branch I forked that Laurent was working on 
had
some extra patches at the start of the series: some were required for q800 
whilst
others were for new development. I thought that all of the patches required for 
q800
had been applied over the past few months, but sadly that isn't the case :(

I've pushed an updated branch to https://github.com/mcayland/qemu/tree/q800-test
which contains the patchset plus two extra patches that are still needed to 
boot to
the debian installer here:

9281a5371f "tmp"
629754d847 "target/m68k: manage FPU exceptions"

Laurent, are these patches ready for upstream or do they need work in which 
case we
should leave q800 until the 3.2 cycle?


ATB,

Mark.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]