qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/14] qemu-nbd: Simplify --partition handling


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/14] qemu-nbd: Simplify --partition handling
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 10:26:05 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.1

On 12/5/18 9:40 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
01.12.2018 1:03, Eric Blake wrote:
Our open-coding of strtol handling forgot to handle overflow
conditions. What's more, since we insiste on a user-supplied
partition to be non-zero, we can use 0 rather than -1 for our
initial value to distinguish when a partition is not being
served, for slightly more optimal code.


-            if (partition < 1 || partition > 8) {
-                error_report("Invalid partition %d", partition);
+            if (qemu_strtoi(optarg, NULL, 0, &partition) < 0 ||

I decided to look into qemu_strtoi, hmm.

is it possible, that "char *ep" remains uninitialized, and than we access
it in check_strtox_error? I don's see in strtol spec a guarantee of setting
endptr on failure path.

C99 7.10.1.4 P5-7 requires strtoll() and friends to assign through 'endptr' if it is non-NULL, for both success and ERANGE failure cases. POSIX then further requires 'endptr' to be set for EINVAL failures due to out-of-range 'base' (not that we have any such callers), and permits (but does not require) the empty string to cause an EINVAL failure (but whether or not EINVAL happened, 'endptr' is still set). There are no other possible failures, so no, we are not dereferencing an uninitialized variable in check_strtox_error.



+                partition < 1 || partition > 8) {

don't you like brace on separate line after multi-line conditions?

CODING_STYLE is silent on the matter; checkpatch.pl allows either style for multi-line, while requesting the same line as the condition for one-line (see commit a97ceca57). But since I'm already in the habit of putting { right after the condition because of checkpatch, I don't go out of my way to put it on its own line after multi-line conditionals. I don't think it matters too much.

--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]