qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] i386/kvm: expose HV_CPUID_ENLIGHTMENT_INFO.EAX


From: Eduardo Habkost
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] i386/kvm: expose HV_CPUID_ENLIGHTMENT_INFO.EAX and HV_CPUID_NESTED_FEATURES.EAX as feature words
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 12:32:39 -0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 11:54:30AM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Vitaly Kuznetsov <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> >> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 06:25:06PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> >>> Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> writes:
> >>> 
> >>> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 03:17:06PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> >>> >> Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> writes:
> >>> > [...]
> >>> >> > But note that we might still be able to move the existing
> >>> >> > "hyperv_*" features to feature_word_info[].feat_names.  We just
> >>> >> > need to keep the same semantics (e.g. enable
> >>> >> > HV_HYPERCALL_AVAILABLE automatically when some features are set).
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Maybe we can make some of the feature properties read-only.  This
> >>> >> > way we can give them meaningful names for debugging and error
> >>> >> > messages, even if we don't want to make them configurable
> >>> >> > directly.
> >>> >> 
> >>> >> I'd suggest (if there are no objections of course) we do this 
> >>> >> separately
> >>> >> from this patch. [...]
> >>> >
> >>> > Agreed.
> >>> >
> >>> 
> >>> Paolo, Eduardo,
> >>> 
> >>> in case there are no concerns here, could you please pick this patch up?
> >>> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Queued, thanks!
> >>
> >> Can you please send the comment you wrote about feat_names as a
> >> follow-up patch?
> >
> > Oops, sorry, I just realized I promissed to send out v2 with it and
> > aparently never did. Will send out a follow-up patch shortly. Thanks!
> 
> Hey Eduardo,
> 
> any news about the fate of this patch?
> 
> (Correcting myself: there was v2 with the comment included:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-12/msg00355.html
> 
> but as I sent the follow-up patch you requested separately too:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-12/msg05463.html
> )

Patch was queued but I took too long to send a pull request,
sorry.  Pull request is being sent right now.

-- 
Eduardo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]