qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH] iotests: drop unnecessary accel=kv


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH] iotests: drop unnecessary accel=kvm
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:07:58 +0000

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 12:12 PM Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
<address@hidden> wrote:
> 19.02.2019 15:02, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > On 19/02/2019 12.59, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >> Tests 235 and 238 do not require the kvm accelerator.  TCG works fine.
> >>
> >> Use the default accelerator instead of requiring kvm.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden>
> >> ---
> >>   tests/qemu-iotests/235 | 1 -
> >>   tests/qemu-iotests/238 | 1 -
> >>   2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/235 b/tests/qemu-iotests/235
> >> index d6edd97ab4..329da8f0c2 100755
> >> --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/235
> >> +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/235
> >> @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ qemu_img_create('-f', iotests.imgfmt, '-o', 
> >> 'preallocation=metadata', disk,
> >>                   str(size))
> >>
> >>   vm = QEMUMachine(iotests.qemu_prog)
> >> -vm.add_args('-machine', 'accel=kvm')
> >
> > According to the initial commit log of 235:
> >
> >   "iotests: simple mirror test with kvm on 1G image"
> >
> > ... so I assume KVM was used on purpose here?
> >
> >   Thomas
> >
>
> As I remember kvm is not really necessary, and test have a comment about it:
> # And it didn't reproduce if at least one of the following:
> ...
> # 3. drop kvm and use iotests.VM() (maybe, because of qtest) (however, it 
> still
> #    reproduces, if just drop kvm, but gdb failed to produce full backtraces
> #    for me)
>
> But the comment should be updated with this patch.

Will fix in v2.

Stefan



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]