[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug 1883784] [NEW] [ppc64le] qemu behavior differs from ppc64le hardwar
From: |
Evan Nemerson |
Subject: |
[Bug 1883784] [NEW] [ppc64le] qemu behavior differs from ppc64le hardware |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Jun 2020 20:27:45 -0000 |
Public bug reported:
I have some code which passes my test suite on PPC64LE hardware when
compiled with GCC 10, but the saem binary fails with both qemu-ppc64le
4.2 (on Fedora 32) and qemu-ppc64le-static 5.0.0 (Debian testing).
I'm not getting any errors about illegal instructions or anything, like
that; the results are just silently different on qemu.
I've generated a reduced test case, which is attached along with the
binaries (both are the same code, one is just statically linked). They
should execute successufully on PPC64LE hardware, but on qemu they hit a
__builtin_abort (because the computed value doesn't match the expected
value).
Without being familiar with PPC assembly I'm not sure what else I can
do, but if there is anything please let me know.
** Affects: qemu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: ppc64le
** Attachment added: "test case"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883784/+attachment/5384531/+files/mm_cvtpd_ps.tar.bz2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883784
Title:
[ppc64le] qemu behavior differs from ppc64le hardware
Status in QEMU:
New
Bug description:
I have some code which passes my test suite on PPC64LE hardware when
compiled with GCC 10, but the saem binary fails with both qemu-ppc64le
4.2 (on Fedora 32) and qemu-ppc64le-static 5.0.0 (Debian testing).
I'm not getting any errors about illegal instructions or anything,
like that; the results are just silently different on qemu.
I've generated a reduced test case, which is attached along with the
binaries (both are the same code, one is just statically linked).
They should execute successufully on PPC64LE hardware, but on qemu
they hit a __builtin_abort (because the computed value doesn't match
the expected value).
Without being familiar with PPC assembly I'm not sure what else I can
do, but if there is anything please let me know.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1883784/+subscriptions
- [Bug 1883784] [NEW] [ppc64le] qemu behavior differs from ppc64le hardware,
Evan Nemerson <=