Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] Modification to remove a h2g() call and calculate properly instead

[Alexander Graf]

On 05.01.2013, at 01:35, Samuel Seay wrote:

> Peter Maydell recommended the change to be more proper. The result was tested
> and shows coming up with the same proper value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Seay <address@hidden>

Thanks, applied to ppc-next with a modified subject line.

Please take a few minutes and read through patch subjects and patch 
descriptions of other people's patches (just run git log) to get a hang for 
what exactly would be useful to have in there and what wouldn't.


Alex

> ---
> linux-user/signal.c |    2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/linux-user/signal.c b/linux-user/signal.c
> index c43b8ac..bb08a93 100644
> --- a/linux-user/signal.c
> +++ b/linux-user/signal.c
> @@ -4614,7 +4614,7 @@ static void setup_frame(int sig, struct 
> target_sigaction *ka,
>     /* Set up registers for signal handler.  */
>     env->gpr[1] = newsp;
>     env->gpr[3] = signal;
> -    env->gpr[4] = (target_ulong) h2g(sc);
> +    env->gpr[4] = frame_addr + offsetof(struct target_sigframe, sctx);
>     env->nip = (target_ulong) ka->_sa_handler;
>     /* Signal handlers are entered in big-endian mode.  */
>     env->msr &= ~MSR_LE;
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
>