qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] 2/4] target-ppc: Implement bcdctn. instruction


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] 2/4] target-ppc: Implement bcdctn. instruction
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 11:16:29 +1100
User-agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 02:13:13PM -0200, address@hidden wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:20:17PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:18:56AM -0200, Jose Ricardo Ziviani wrote:
> > > bcdctn. converts from BCD to National numeric format. National format
> > > uses a byte to represent a digit where the most significant nibble is
> > > always 0x3 and the least sign. nibbles is the digit itself.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jose Ricardo Ziviani <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > >  target-ppc/helper.h                 |  1 +
> > >  target-ppc/int_helper.c             | 46 
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  target-ppc/translate/vmx-impl.inc.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/target-ppc/helper.h b/target-ppc/helper.h
> > > index d30ec60..92eaaf0 100644
> > > --- a/target-ppc/helper.h
> > > +++ b/target-ppc/helper.h
> > > @@ -370,6 +370,7 @@ DEF_HELPER_4(vpermxor, void, avr, avr, avr, avr)
> > >  DEF_HELPER_4(bcdadd, i32, avr, avr, avr, i32)
> > >  DEF_HELPER_4(bcdsub, i32, avr, avr, avr, i32)
> > >  DEF_HELPER_3(bcdcfn, i32, avr, avr, i32)
> > > +DEF_HELPER_2(bcdctn, i32, avr, avr)
> > >  
> > >  DEF_HELPER_2(xsadddp, void, env, i32)
> > >  DEF_HELPER_2(xssubdp, void, env, i32)
> > > diff --git a/target-ppc/int_helper.c b/target-ppc/int_helper.c
> > > index 494c74e..cffe82c 100644
> > > --- a/target-ppc/int_helper.c
> > > +++ b/target-ppc/int_helper.c
> > > @@ -2494,6 +2494,17 @@ static uint8_t get_national_digit(ppc_avr_t *reg, 
> > > int n)
> > >  #endif
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static void set_national_digit(ppc_avr_t *reg, uint8_t val, int n)
> > > +{
> > > +#if defined(HOST_WORDS_BIGENDIAN)
> > > +    reg->u16[8 - n] &= 0;
> > > +    reg->u16[8 - n] |= val;
> > 
> > The &= always sets the value to 0, so you might as well just use a
> > plain assignment in place of the &=, |=.
> 
> OK! I'll fix it in v2.
> 
> > 
> > > +#else
> > > +    reg->u16[n] &= 0;
> > > +    reg->u16[n] |= val;
> > > +#endif
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static int bcd_cmp_mag(ppc_avr_t *a, ppc_avr_t *b)
> > >  {
> > >      int i;
> > > @@ -2667,6 +2678,41 @@ uint32_t helper_bcdcfn(ppc_avr_t *r, ppc_avr_t *b, 
> > > uint32_t ps)
> > >      return cr;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +uint32_t helper_bcdctn(ppc_avr_t *r, ppc_avr_t *b)
> > > +{
> > > +    int i;
> > > +    int cr = 0;
> > > +    int invalid = 0;
> > > +    int sgnb = bcd_get_sgn(b);
> > > +    ppc_avr_t ret = { .u64 = { 0, 0 } };
> > > +
> > > +    int eq_flag = (b->u64[HI_IDX] == 0) && ((b->u64[LO_IDX] >> 4) == 0);
> > > +    int ox_flag = (b->u64[HI_IDX] != 0) || ((b->u64[LO_IDX] >> 8) != 0);
> > 
> > This looks wrong.  You're shifing the low half right 8 bits ==  2
> > nybbles == 1 digit + sign.  So this will set the overflow flag if your
> > input is a number of >1 digit.  I think you want >>32, so it only sets
> > overflow if the input exceeds 7 decimal digits + sign.
> 
> OK! I'll fix it in v2.
> 
> > 
> > > +    for (i = 1; i < 8; i++) {
> > > +        set_national_digit(&ret, 0x30 + bcd_get_digit(b, i, &invalid), 
> > > i);
> > > +    }
> > > +    set_national_digit(&ret, (sgnb == -1) ? NATIONAL_NEG : 
> > > NATIONAL_PLUS, 0);
> > > +
> > > +    if (!eq_flag) {
> > > +        cr = (sgnb == -1) ? 1 << CRF_LT : 1 << CRF_GT;
> > > +    } else {
> > > +        cr = 1 << CRF_EQ;
> > > +    }
> > > +
> > > +    if (ox_flag) {
> > > +        cr |= 1 << CRF_SO;
> > > +    }
> > > +
> > > +    if (unlikely(invalid)) {
> > > +        cr = 1 << CRF_SO;
> > > +    }
> > > +
> > > +    *r = ret;
> > > +
> > > +    return cr;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  void helper_vsbox(ppc_avr_t *r, ppc_avr_t *a)
> > >  {
> > >      int i;
> > > diff --git a/target-ppc/translate/vmx-impl.inc.c 
> > > b/target-ppc/translate/vmx-impl.inc.c
> > > index 2abdcac..4364881 100644
> > > --- a/target-ppc/translate/vmx-impl.inc.c
> > > +++ b/target-ppc/translate/vmx-impl.inc.c
> > > @@ -894,9 +894,29 @@ static void gen_##op(DisasContext *ctx)             \
> > >      tcg_temp_free_i32(ps);                          \
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +#define GEN_BCD3(op)                                \
> > > +static void gen_##op(DisasContext *ctx)             \
> > > +{                                                   \
> > > +    TCGv_ptr rb, rd;                                \
> > > +                                                    \
> > > +    if (unlikely(!ctx->altivec_enabled)) {          \
> > > +        gen_exception(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_VPU);       \
> > > +        return;                                     \
> > > +    }                                               \
> > > +                                                    \
> > > +    rb = gen_avr_ptr(rB(ctx->opcode));              \
> > > +    rd = gen_avr_ptr(rD(ctx->opcode));              \
> > > +                                                    \
> > > +    gen_helper_##op(cpu_crf[6], rd, rb);            \
> > > +                                                    \
> > > +    tcg_temp_free_ptr(rb);                          \
> > > +    tcg_temp_free_ptr(rd);                          \
> > > +}
> > >  GEN_BCD(bcdadd)
> > >  GEN_BCD(bcdsub)
> > >  GEN_BCD2(bcdcfn)
> > > +GEN_BCD3(bcdctn)
> > >  
> > >  static void gen_xpnd04_1(DisasContext *ctx)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -908,7 +928,8 @@ static void gen_xpnd04_1(DisasContext *ctx)
> > >      case 4:
> > >          break; /* bcdctz. */
> > >      case 5:
> > > -        break; /* bcdctn. */
> > > +        gen_bcdctn(ctx);
> > > +        break;
> > >      case 6:
> > >          break; /* bcdcfz. */
> > >      case 7:
> > 
> > Uh.. doesn't adding bcdctn to this make it identical to gen_xpnd04_2?
> 
> Actually this opcode is invalid for bcdctn as per ISA3.0.
> 
> Do you think that I should throw something like a SIGILL for this particular 
> case?

Yes, if the opcode is invalid, you absolutely should be throwing an
invalid instruction exception.

> > 
> > > @@ -1024,3 +1045,4 @@ GEN_VXFORM_DUAL(vsldoi, PPC_ALTIVEC, PPC_NONE,
> > >  #undef GEN_VAFORM_PAIRED
> > >  
> > >  #undef GEN_BCD2
> > > +#undef GEN_BCD3
> > 
> 
> 

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]