qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [FIX PATCH v2] spapr: Fix QEMU abort during memory unplug


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [FIX PATCH v2] spapr: Fix QEMU abort during memory unplug
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 12:49:02 +1000
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 08:23:02AM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> 
> 
> On 07/21/2017 03:57 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:21:06AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> > > Commit 0cffce56 (hw/ppc/spapr.c: adding pending_dimm_unplugs to
> > > sPAPRMachineState) introduced a new way to track pending LMBs of DIMM
> > > device that is marked for removal. Since this commit we can hit the
> > > assert in spapr_pending_dimm_unplugs_add() in the following situation:
> > > 
> > > - DIMM device removal fails as the guest doesn't allow the removal.
> > > - Subsequent attempt to remove the same DIMM would hit the assert
> > >    as the corresponding sPAPRDIMMState is still part of the
> > >    pending_dimm_unplugs list.
> > > 
> > > Fix this by removing the assert and conditionally adding the
> > > sPAPRDIMMState to pending_dimm_unplugs list only when it is not
> > > already present.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 0cffce56ae3501c5783d779f97993ce478acf856
> > > Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <address@hidden>
> > Applied to ppc-for-2.10.
> > 
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - sPAPRDIMMState is now allocated within spapr_pending_dimm_unplugs_add()
> > >    itself (David Gibson)
> > > - spapr_recover_pending_dimm_state() should never return a NULL 
> > > sPAPRDIMMState,
> > >    added an assert for the same.
> > > 
> > >   hw/ppc/spapr.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> > >   1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > > index 1cb09e7..2465b27 100644
> > > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > > @@ -2850,11 +2850,25 @@ static sPAPRDIMMState 
> > > *spapr_pending_dimm_unplugs_find(sPAPRMachineState *s,
> > >       return dimm_state;
> > >   }
> > > -static void spapr_pending_dimm_unplugs_add(sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> > > -                                           sPAPRDIMMState *dimm_state)
> > > +static sPAPRDIMMState *spapr_pending_dimm_unplugs_add(sPAPRMachineState 
> > > *spapr,
> > > +                                                      uint32_t nr_lmbs,
> > > +                                                      PCDIMMDevice *dimm)
> > >   {
> > > -    g_assert(!spapr_pending_dimm_unplugs_find(spapr, dimm_state->dimm));
> > > -    QTAILQ_INSERT_HEAD(&spapr->pending_dimm_unplugs, dimm_state, next);
> > > +    sPAPRDIMMState *ds = NULL;
> > > +
> > > +    /*
> > > +     * If this request is for a DIMM whose removal had failed earlier
> > > +     * (due to guest's refusal to remove the LMBs), we would have this
> > > +     * dimm already in the pending_dimm_unplugs list. In that
> > > +     * case don't add again.
> > > +     */
> > > +    if (!spapr_pending_dimm_unplugs_find(spapr, dimm)) {
> > > +        ds = g_malloc0(sizeof(sPAPRDIMMState));
> > > +        ds->nr_lmbs = nr_lmbs;
> > > +        ds->dimm = dimm;
> > > +        QTAILQ_INSERT_HEAD(&spapr->pending_dimm_unplugs, ds, next);
> > > +    }
> > > +    return ds;
> In case unplugs_find() founds a DIMM state (the condition this patch is
> trying to fix), ds is
> returned as NULL. This is working because unplug_request() does not use the
> return value
> of unplugs_add() and because recover() is only called if find() returns
> NULL. Still not
> so pretty.
> 
> What makes sense here is something like:
> 
>     ds = spapr_pending_dimm_unplugs_find(spapr, dimm);
>     if (!ds) {
>         (...)
>     }
>     return ds;
> 
> I think this is not worth sending a v3, David can amend it in the tree.
> After amending feel
> free to add my

Good point, amended.

> 
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Barboza <address@hidden>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > >   }
> > >   static void spapr_pending_dimm_unplugs_remove(sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> > > @@ -2875,7 +2889,6 @@ static sPAPRDIMMState 
> > > *spapr_recover_pending_dimm_state(sPAPRMachineState *ms,
> > >       uint32_t avail_lmbs = 0;
> > >       uint64_t addr_start, addr;
> > >       int i;
> > > -    sPAPRDIMMState *ds;
> > >       addr_start = object_property_get_int(OBJECT(dimm), 
> > > PC_DIMM_ADDR_PROP,
> > >                                            &error_abort);
> > > @@ -2891,11 +2904,7 @@ static sPAPRDIMMState 
> > > *spapr_recover_pending_dimm_state(sPAPRMachineState *ms,
> > >           addr += SPAPR_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE;
> > >       }
> > > -    ds = g_malloc0(sizeof(sPAPRDIMMState));
> > > -    ds->nr_lmbs = avail_lmbs;
> > > -    ds->dimm = dimm;
> > > -    spapr_pending_dimm_unplugs_add(ms, ds);
> > > -    return ds;
> > > +    return spapr_pending_dimm_unplugs_add(ms, avail_lmbs, dimm);
> > >   }
> > >   /* Callback to be called during DRC release. */
> > > @@ -2911,6 +2920,7 @@ void spapr_lmb_release(DeviceState *dev)
> > >        * during the unplug process. In this case recover it. */
> > >       if (ds == NULL) {
> > >           ds = spapr_recover_pending_dimm_state(spapr, PC_DIMM(dev));
> > > +        g_assert(ds);
> > >           /* The DRC being examined by the caller at least must be 
> > > counted */
> > >           g_assert(ds->nr_lmbs);
> > >       }
> > > @@ -2942,18 +2952,13 @@ static void 
> > > spapr_memory_unplug_request(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> > >       uint64_t addr_start, addr;
> > >       int i;
> > >       sPAPRDRConnector *drc;
> > > -    sPAPRDIMMState *ds;
> > > -
> > >       addr_start = object_property_get_uint(OBJECT(dimm), 
> > > PC_DIMM_ADDR_PROP,
> > >                                            &local_err);
> > >       if (local_err) {
> > >           goto out;
> > >       }
> > > -    ds = g_malloc0(sizeof(sPAPRDIMMState));
> > > -    ds->nr_lmbs = nr_lmbs;
> > > -    ds->dimm = dimm;
> > > -    spapr_pending_dimm_unplugs_add(spapr, ds);
> > > +    spapr_pending_dimm_unplugs_add(spapr, nr_lmbs, dimm);
> > >       addr = addr_start;
> > >       for (i = 0; i < nr_lmbs; i++) {
> 

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]