qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] monitor: add proper reference co


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] monitor: add proper reference counting of the current CPU
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 11:24:59 +0200

On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 10:35:31 +0200
Greg Kurz <address@hidden> wrote:

> If a CPU selected with the "cpu" command is hot-unplugged then "info cpus"
> causes QEMU to exit:
> 
> (qemu) device_del cpu1
> (qemu) info cpus
> qemu:qemu_cpu_kick_thread: No such process
> 
> This happens because "cpu" stores the pointer to the selected CPU into
> the monitor structure. When the CPU is hot-unplugged, we end up with a
> dangling pointer. The "info cpus" command then does:
> 
> hmp_info_cpus()
>  monitor_get_cpu_index()
>   mon_get_cpu()
>    cpu_synchronize_state() <--- called with dangling pointer
> 
> This could cause a QEMU crash as well.
> 
> This patch switches the monitor to use object_ref() to ensure the
> CPU object doesn't vanish unexpectedly. The reference is dropped
> either when "cpu" is used to switch to another CPU, or when the
> selected CPU is unrealized and cpu_list_remove() sets its cpu_index
> back to UNASSIGNED_CPU_INDEX.
I don't really like an idea of leaving dangling cpu around.
Is it possible to store QOM path on set_cpu in monitor and
resolving it each to instance each time it's needed?


> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
> ---
>  monitor.c |   12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
> index fe0d1bdbb461..1c0b9a2c3ad3 100644
> --- a/monitor.c
> +++ b/monitor.c
> @@ -579,6 +579,9 @@ static void monitor_data_init(Monitor *mon)
>  
>  static void monitor_data_destroy(Monitor *mon)
>  {
> +    if (mon->mon_cpu) {
> +        object_unref((Object *) mon->mon_cpu);
> +    }
>      qemu_chr_fe_deinit(&mon->chr, false);
>      if (monitor_is_qmp(mon)) {
>          json_message_parser_destroy(&mon->qmp.parser);
> @@ -1047,12 +1050,21 @@ int monitor_set_cpu(int cpu_index)
>      if (cpu == NULL) {
>          return -1;
>      }
> +    if (cur_mon->mon_cpu) {
> +        object_unref((Object *) cur_mon->mon_cpu);
> +    }
>      cur_mon->mon_cpu = cpu;
> +    object_ref((Object *) cpu);
>      return 0;
>  }
>  
>  CPUState *mon_get_cpu(void)
>  {
> +    if (cur_mon->mon_cpu &&
> +        cur_mon->mon_cpu->cpu_index == UNASSIGNED_CPU_INDEX) {
> +        object_unref((Object *) cur_mon->mon_cpu);
> +        cur_mon->mon_cpu = NULL;
> +    }
>      if (!cur_mon->mon_cpu) {
>          if (!first_cpu) {
>              return NULL;
> 
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]