qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-ppc] [PULL 6/9] hw/ppc/spapr: Allow "spapr-vlan" as NIC model name


From: David Gibson
Subject: [Qemu-ppc] [PULL 6/9] hw/ppc/spapr: Allow "spapr-vlan" as NIC model name beside "ibmveth"
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:19:00 +1100

From: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>

With the new "--nic" command line parameter option, the "old" way of
specifying a NIC model via the nd_table[] is becoming more prominent
again. But for the pseries "spapr-vlan" device, there is a confusing
discrepancy between the model name that is used for "--device" (i.e.
"spapr-vlan") and the model name that has to be used for "--net nic"
or the new "--nic" parameter (i.e. "ibmveth"). Since "spapr-vlan" is
the "real" name of the device, let's allow "spapr-vlan" to be used
as model name for the nd_table[] entries, too.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
---
 hw/ppc/spapr.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
index 7e1c858566..dfa9e43601 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
@@ -2607,10 +2607,11 @@ static void spapr_machine_init(MachineState *machine)
         NICInfo *nd = &nd_table[i];
 
         if (!nd->model) {
-            nd->model = g_strdup("ibmveth");
+            nd->model = g_strdup("spapr-vlan");
         }
 
-        if (strcmp(nd->model, "ibmveth") == 0) {
+        if (g_str_equal(nd->model, "spapr-vlan") ||
+            g_str_equal(nd->model, "ibmveth")) {
             spapr_vlan_create(spapr->vio_bus, nd);
         } else {
             pci_nic_init_nofail(&nd_table[i], phb->bus, nd->model, NULL);
-- 
2.14.3




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]