qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [GIT PULL for qemu-pseries] pseries: Update SLOF firmware


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [GIT PULL for qemu-pseries] pseries: Update SLOF firmware image
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 07:22:48 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0

On 12.07.2018 07:14, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 07:01:34 +0200
> Thomas Huth <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> On 12.07.2018 03:01, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 08:53:05PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:  
>>>> On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 16:26:19 +1000
>>>> David Gibson <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>  
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 05:14:53PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:  
>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 16:42:48 +1000
>>>>>> David Gibson <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>     
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 12:22:44PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:   
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> On Mon,  2 Jul 2018 16:26:44 +1000
>>>>>>>> Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>> The following changes since commit 
>>>>>>>>> edb1fb337f65f82fe32b989c4f018efe85c1dddb:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>   pseries: Update SLOF firmware image (2018-07-02 16:21:30 +1000)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>   address@hidden:aik/qemu.git tags/qemu-slof-20180702
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> for you to fetch changes up to 
>>>>>>>>> edb1fb337f65f82fe32b989c4f018efe85c1dddb:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>   pseries: Update SLOF firmware image (2018-07-02 16:21:30 +1000)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I just missed a couple of gcc 8.1 fixes and thought I can still 
>>>>>>>>> squeeze
>>>>>>>>> them before the 3.0  soft freeze.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *** Note: this is not for master, this is for pseries      
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not good for 3.1 either?      
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ugh.. somehow I missed this SLOF update request, and now we're in 3.0
>>>>>>> hard freeze.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How bad are the bugs this SLOF update fixes?    
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These only fix gcc 8.1 warnings and runtime errors => not really
>>>>>> bugfixes so it is not a big deal if they miss 3.0.    
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, well, if you want to resend the update, I'll queue it for 3.1.  
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It is still on github, why resend?  
>>>
>>> Good point, done.  
>>
>> Won't there be another update in the 3.1 time frame? If yes, this sounds
>> like wasted space in the repository to me (the firmware blobs are rather
>> big, and there are no new features in that binary, just fixes for
>> compiling with GCC 8 ... and people who want to compile SLOF on their
>> own can use the sources from aik's git tree, too).
> 
> I compiled the blob with gcc 8.1 and if something goes wrong I'd rather
> know this earlier than later - this my motivation, not the fixes
> themselves.

Ok, that's a fair argument. But in that case, I think it is even good
that this missed the hard freeze - you likely don't want to hunt
hard-to-debug compiler bugs in the freeze period, do you?

 Thomas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]