qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [Process] QEMU submaintainers and pull req


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [Process] QEMU submaintainers and pull requests
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 15:26:46 +0000

On 16 February 2018 at 15:13, Daniel P. Berrangé <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 03:03:07PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 16 February 2018 at 14:53, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > On 16/02/2018 12:25, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> >> On 16 February 2018 at 11:18, Cornelia Huck <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >> The block folks are already doing this, so we should just
>> >> formalize what they're doing at the moment I guess. From my point
>> >> of view as long as there's something I can easily filter
>> >> in/out in the email body or subject so I don't get confused
>> >> (and which doesn't require me to update my filters every time
>> >> a new subsystem switches to using submaintainer pulls!)
>> >> I don't mind about the rest of it. Maybe a subject line with
>> >> 'PULL SUBSYSTEM s390x' (ditto block, etc etc) ?
>> >
>> > What about just requiring you to be in the "To" or "Cc" fields?  That
>> > works pretty well for Linux.
>>
>> It would require existing submaintainers to change their process,
>> though -- currently not all pull requests are to/cc me.
>
> All this time I thought it was /already/ required to cc Peter on
> pull requests !

The only thing I currently require is that the body text
contains the appropriate magic words and that it goes to
qemu-devel in to or cc.

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]