qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2 2/3] hw/s390x/css: Remove QEMU_PACKED from st


From: Cornelia Huck
Subject: Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2 2/3] hw/s390x/css: Remove QEMU_PACKED from struct SenseId
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:51:55 +0200

On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:43:09 +0200
David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 26/09/2018 10:36, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > On 2018-09-26 10:17, David Hildenbrand wrote:  
> >> On 26/09/2018 10:09, Thomas Huth wrote:  
> >>> On 2018-09-26 10:07, David Hildenbrand wrote:  
> >>>> On 26/09/2018 10:04, David Hildenbrand wrote:  
> >>>>> On 26/09/2018 09:38, Thomas Huth wrote:  
> >>>>>> The uint16_t member cu_type of struct SenseId is not naturally aligned,
> >>>>>> and since the struct is marked with QEMU_PACKED, this can lead to
> >>>>>> unaligned memory accesses - which does not work on architectures like
> >>>>>> Sparc. Thus remove the QEMU_PACKED here and rather copy the struct
> >>>>>> byte by byte when we do copy_sense_id_to_guest().
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>  hw/s390x/css.c         | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
> >>>>>>  include/hw/s390x/css.h |  2 +-
> >>>>>>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/css.c b/hw/s390x/css.c
> >>>>>> index 5a9fe45..0e51b85 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/hw/s390x/css.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/hw/s390x/css.c
> >>>>>> @@ -750,20 +750,20 @@ static void sch_handle_halt_func(SubchDev *sch)
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>  }
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>> -static void copy_sense_id_to_guest(SenseId *dest, SenseId *src)
> >>>>>> +static void copy_sense_id_to_guest(uint8_t *dest, SenseId *src)
> >>>>>>  {
> >>>>>>      int i;
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>> -    dest->reserved = src->reserved;
> >>>>>> -    dest->cu_type = cpu_to_be16(src->cu_type);
> >>>>>> -    dest->cu_model = src->cu_model;
> >>>>>> -    dest->dev_type = cpu_to_be16(src->dev_type);
> >>>>>> -    dest->dev_model = src->dev_model;
> >>>>>> -    dest->unused = src->unused;
> >>>>>> -    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dest->ciw); i++) {
> >>>>>> -        dest->ciw[i].type = src->ciw[i].type;
> >>>>>> -        dest->ciw[i].command = src->ciw[i].command;
> >>>>>> -        dest->ciw[i].count = cpu_to_be16(src->ciw[i].count);
> >>>>>> +    dest[0] = src->reserved;
> >>>>>> +    stw_be_p(dest + 1, src->cu_type);
> >>>>>> +    dest[3] = src->cu_model;
> >>>>>> +    stw_be_p(dest + 4, src->dev_type);
> >>>>>> +    dest[6] = src->dev_model;
> >>>>>> +    dest[7] = src->unused;
> >>>>>> +    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(src->ciw); i++) {
> >>>>>> +        dest[8 + i * 4] = src->ciw[i].type;
> >>>>>> +        dest[9 + i * 4] = src->ciw[i].command;
> >>>>>> +        stw_be_p(dest + 10 + i * 4, src->ciw[i].count);  
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Not really a fan of this, as we sacrifice readability due to one
> >>>>> unaligned member. What about only converting the unaligned members (e.g.
> >>>>> cu_type) from uint16_t to uint8_t[2] and adding a comment why this is
> >>>>> split. Then the structure is naturally packed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We only have to fixup the places that check cu_type.
> >>>>>  
> >>>>
> >>>> Just realized this was basically suggested by Peter. If it would be as
> >>>> simple as splitting VMSTATE_UINT16 into two VMSTATE_UINT8 or similar, I
> >>>> would prefer that.  
> >>>
> >>> It's not that simple, it would break migration from older versions of
> >>> QEMU due to endianness issues then.  
> >>
> >> Migration between different QEMUs (e.g. big to little) is not supported
> >> as far as I remember. But my head always hurts when thinking about
> >> endianness conversions, so I am pretty sure I am missing something here.  
> > 
> > I was not talking about migration between hosts with different
> > endianess, but e.g. migration from a x86 host to a x86 host. If you want
> > to send 0x1234, that would be 0x34 0x12 when using a 16-bit value, but
> > if you break it up into hi- and low, then it's 0x12 0x34 instead.
> > 
> > Hmm, actually the migration code seems to properly convert 16-bit values
> > to network byte order, so maybe this could even work. But honestly, I
> > still think we should avoid QEMU_PACKED as much as possible and better
> > fill in the memory in copy_sense_id_to_guest() via a byte array here. As
> > we've seen now, QEMU_PACKED can easily result in non-portable code, so
> > even if copy_sense_id_to_guest() looks a little bit uglier now than
> > before, it's certainly the better and more portable way to do this.
> > 
> >  Thomas
> >   
> 
> IMHO something like that looks much better (hope I am not messing up
> cu_type)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/css.c b/hw/s390x/css.c
> index 5a9fe45ce8..db378f6238 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/css.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/css.c
> @@ -750,12 +750,13 @@ static void sch_handle_halt_func(SubchDev *sch)
> 
>  }
> 
> -static void copy_sense_id_to_guest(SenseId *dest, SenseId *src)
> +static void copy_sense_id_to_guest(SenseIdPacked *dest, SenseId *src)
>  {
>      int i;
> 
>      dest->reserved = src->reserved;
> -    dest->cu_type = cpu_to_be16(src->cu_type);
> +    /* avoid unaligned accesses */
> +    dest->cu_type[0] = cpu_to_be16(src->cu_type) >> 8;
> +    dest->cu_type[1] = cpu_to_be16(src->cu_type);
>      dest->cu_model = src->cu_model;
>      dest->dev_type = cpu_to_be16(src->dev_type);
>      dest->dev_model = src->dev_model;
> @@ -1044,7 +1045,7 @@ static int css_interpret_ccw(SubchDev *sch, hwaddr
> ccw_addr,
>          break;
>      case CCW_CMD_SENSE_ID:
>      {
> -        SenseId sense_id;
> +        SenseIdPacked sense_id;
> 
>          copy_sense_id_to_guest(&sense_id, &sch->id);
>          /* Sense ID information is device specific. */
> diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/css.h b/include/hw/s390x/css.h
> index 9da5912921..592640f4dd 100644
> --- a/include/hw/s390x/css.h
> +++ b/include/hw/s390x/css.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,17 @@ typedef struct CIW {
>      uint16_t count;
>  } QEMU_PACKED CIW;
> 
> +/* Same as SenseID but naturally packed (what the guest wants) */
> +typedef struct SenseIdPacked {
> +    uint8_t reserved;
> +    uint8_t cu_type[2];
> +    uint8_t cu_model;
> +    uint16_t dev_type;
> +    uint8_t dev_model;
> +    uint8_t unused;
> +    CIW ciw[MAX_CIWS];
> +} SenseId;
> +
>  typedef struct SenseId {
>      /* common part */
>      uint8_t reserved;        /* always 0x'FF' */
> @@ -48,7 +59,7 @@ typedef struct SenseId {
>      uint8_t unused;          /* padding byte */
>      /* extended part */
>      CIW ciw[MAX_CIWS];       /* variable # of CIWs */
> -} QEMU_PACKED SenseId;
> +} SenseId;
> 
>  /* Channel measurements, from linux/drivers/s390/cio/cmf.c. */
>  typedef struct CMB {
> 
> 

I like that version, although I have not reviewed it deeply :)



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]