qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH 06/15] s390-bios: Clean up cio.h


From: Cornelia Huck
Subject: Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH 06/15] s390-bios: Clean up cio.h
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 11:48:01 +0100

On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 08:29:13 -0500
"Jason J. Herne" <address@hidden> wrote:

> Add proper typedefs to all structs and modify all bit fields to use consistent
> formatting.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Collin Walling <address@hidden>
> ---
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h      | 86 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h |  8 -----
>  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h
> index 1a0795f..a48eee5 100644
> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h
> @@ -53,12 +53,12 @@ struct schib_config {
>      __u64 mba;
>      __u32 intparm;
>      __u16 mbi;
> -    __u32 isc:3;
> -    __u32 ena:1;
> -    __u32 mme:2;
> -    __u32 mp:1;
> -    __u32 csense:1;
> -    __u32 mbfc:1;
> +    __u32 isc    : 3;
> +    __u32 ena    : 1;
> +    __u32 mme    : 2;
> +    __u32 mp     : 1;
> +    __u32 csense : 1;
> +    __u32 mbfc   : 1;
>  } __attribute__ ((packed));

This seems to make checkpatch unhappy... maybe consolidate to the other
formatting instead?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]