qemu-stable
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-stable] [ANNOUNCE] QEMU 2.6.1 Stable released


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: Re: [Qemu-stable] [ANNOUNCE] QEMU 2.6.1 Stable released
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 16:42:48 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17)

On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 03:58:26PM -0500, Michael Roth wrote:
> Quoting Stefan Hajnoczi (2016-09-05 12:54:35)
> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 01:45:56PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
> > > Am 25.08.2016 um 19:23 schrieb Michael Roth:
> > > > Quoting Peter Lieven (2016-08-25 01:38:13)
> > > > > 7c509d1 virtio: decrement vq->inuse in virtqueue_discard()
> > > > > 700f26b virtio: recalculate vq->inuse after migration
> > > > Looks like these got posted during the freeze :(
> > > > 
> > > > > The virtio thing is important because live migration is broken without
> > > > > the fix as  86cc089 is in 2.6.1.
> > > > Not sure I understand the relation to 86cc089. Wouldn't the check
> > > > introduced there always pass due to target initializing inuse to 0?
> > > > 
> > > > Or is the issue that the fix introduced in 86cc089 is only partially
> > > > effective due to inuse not being recalculated properly on target? That 
> > > > might
> > > > warrant a 2.6.1.1...
> > > 
> > > This is what Stefan wrote in the cover letter to the series:
> > > 
> > > "I should mention this is for QEMU 2.7. These fixes are needed if the
> > > CVE-2016-5403 patch has been applied. Without these patches any device 
> > > that holds VirtQueueElements acros
> > > live migration will terminate with a "Virtqueue size exceeded" error 
> > > message. virtio-balloon and virtio-scsi are affected. virtio-bl
> > > probably too but I haven't tested it."
> > > 
> > > Maybe
> > 
> > The virtio inuse fixes are needed for stable (v2.6.2?) so that the
> > spurious "Virtqueue size exceeded" on migration is solved.
> > 
> > The error can be reproduced when there is a VirtQueueElement pending
> > across migration (e.g. virtio-blk s->rq failed request list).
> 
> Thanks for clarifying. I'm planning to do a 2.6.2 to capture these, the
> patches Peter mentioned, and some other fixes that came during 2.7 RC
> phase.
> 
> I have an initial staging tree at:
> 
>   https://github.com/mdroth/qemu/commits/stable-2.6-staging
> 
> There's still a few PULLs in flight with patches I plan to pull in, but
> hoping to send out the patch round-up early next week and a release the
> following week.

Two more candidates for stable:

4b7f91e virtio: zero vq->inuse in virtio_reset()
104e70c virtio-balloon: discard virtqueue element on reset

They also deal with "Virtqueue size exceeded" errors.

Stefan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]