[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-stable] a svvp bug related question
From: |
Vadim Rozenfeld |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-stable] a svvp bug related question |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Sep 2016 05:23:44 -0400 (EDT) |
Thanks,
I'm just wondering if "-rtc base=localtime,clock=host,driftfix=slew"
is what we usually use for svvp testing.
Best regards,
Vadim.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yan Vugenfirer" <address@hidden>
To: "Vadim Rozenfeld" <address@hidden>
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 7:08:44 PM
Subject: Re: a svvp bug related question
Yes.
“Interrupt profiling” test was failing and then Paolo suggested to adjust the
minimal timer for KVM to 100ns. It looks that on Intel platforms it was enough.
The SVVP test log also show the deltas it worth looking at it,
Best regards,
Yan.
> On 27 Sep 2016, at 12:02, Vadim Rozenfeld <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Sorry, here it is.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378005
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Yan Vugenfirer" <address@hidden>
> To: "Vadim Rozenfeld" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 6:48:47 PM
> Subject: Re: a svvp bug related question
>
> Hi Vadim,
>
> I get invalid bug ID.
>
> Can you please resend the link?
>
> Best regards,
> Yan.
>> On 27 Sep 2016, at 11:47, Vadim Rozenfeld <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Yan,
>>
>> Could you please take a look at the following problem?
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13780
>>
>> Does it look familiar?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vadim.
>