[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH] commit: Add NULL check for overlay_bs
From: |
Kevin Wolf |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH] commit: Add NULL check for overlay_bs |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:37:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Am 10.07.2017 um 14:09 hat Peter Maydell geschrieben:
> On 10 July 2017 at 12:45, Kevin Wolf <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I can't see how overlay_bs could become NULL with the current code, but
> > other code in this function already checks it and we can make Coverity
> > happy with this check, so let's add it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > block/commit.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/commit.c b/block/commit.c
> > index 774a8a5..50e7950 100644
> > --- a/block/commit.c
> > +++ b/block/commit.c
> > @@ -90,7 +90,9 @@ static void commit_complete(BlockJob *job, void *opaque)
> >
> > /* Make sure overlay_bs and top stay around until
> > bdrv_set_backing_hd() */
> > bdrv_ref(top);
> > - bdrv_ref(overlay_bs);
> > + if (overlay_bs) {
> > + bdrv_ref(overlay_bs);
> > + }
> >
> > /* Remove base node parent that still uses BLK_PERM_WRITE/RESIZE before
> > * the normal backing chain can be restored. */
>
> Commit 19ebd13ed45ad5d5f2 which added the bdrv_ref() call
> was cc qemu-stable; should we cc this fix too, or are you
> happy that it's definitely not actually triggerable in stable?
Okay, I'll add the CC, better safe than sorry.
Kevin
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH] commit: Add NULL check for overlay_bs,
Kevin Wolf <=