[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RP] new fselect command
From: |
David Yitzchak Cohen |
Subject: |
Re: [RP] new fselect command |
Date: |
Fri Mar 7 12:46:10 2003 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:16:04AM -0800, Shawn Betts wrote:
> > Hmm. Do people use more than nine frames often? If so, perhaps "a"
> > could be typed in to go to frame 10, etc. Frames are great, but I
> > never use more than 3 or 4, myself.
> 10 frames on the screen is prett gross :). For completeness, I think
> *something* should be done. But it's not like these frames can't be
> accessed. Just not conveniently. I can't imagine using for that 4
> realistically, and that is a rare event indeed...but then I use emacs
> and there are those who don't.
How about just solving the problem the same way as the select command
works? Have ^tf (or whatever) do labelframes (a new command that you've
already implemented) and then call command mode with selectframe as the
prefix keymap, and in that keymap, have 1 do fselect 1, 2 do fselect
2, etc. That way, we can make fselect called without arguments simply
prompt us for a frame number to select with the usual RETURN following.
(It also means we can do ^tf- to switch back and forth between our last
two used frames, if somebody feels like implementing that in the future.)
- Dave
--
Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor?
It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right?
pgp2R0B8Lk2in.pgp
Description: PGP signature