rdiff-backup-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Increased resource usage in rdiff-backup 0.12.3


From: Ben Escoto
Subject: Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Increased resource usage in rdiff-backup 0.12.3
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 23:41:37 -0700

>>>>> "LM" == Luke Mewburn <address@hidden>
>>>>> wrote the following on Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:59:13 +1000

  LM> For example, on one day a backup failed with File
  LM> "/usr/pkg/lib/python2.2/gzip.py", line 43, in __init__ IOError:
  LM> [Errno 24] Too many open files:

rdiff-backup should only have a few files open at a time.  Isn't there
some way to list the open files?  (I seem to recall some obsure way
but can't remember the specifics.)  Also I think someone running
Solaris had this problem a long time ago, but the resolution was
inconclusive.

  LM> A "normal" run for that file system only needs ~ 15MB of RAM,
  LM> but a --check-destination-dir regression run was using ~ 170MB
  LM> of RAM!  This disparity between the normal and regression runs
  LM> is astounding.

I will have to check on this.  Was there something unusual about your
directory (lots of files, big files, large directories, etc)?

  LM> I don't think I had these issues with rdiff-backup 0.10.x.  Is
  LM> there any reason as to why rdiff-backup needs much higher
  LM> resource limits now?

At least on the destination side (which is where you seemed to have
problems), 0.12.x should be less resource intensive since it shouldn't
have to recurse the mirror tree.  


-- 
Ben Escoto

Attachment: pgpM7RnYyzURH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]