Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Gitea assessment: C0.0

[bill-auger]

David -


if you are having a problem with librejs that has it's won mailing list
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-librejs

i remember that librejs support was added to gitea about 6 months ago
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/1201 so if it does not work now
it would be a regrression bug

the point i would like to bring up though, is that as far as i know, it
is not the intention of this group to evaluate any software applications
such as gitea or kalithea or any other - but to evaluate and list the
reasonably popular public hosting services such as github and bitbucket
- gitlab, for example, is listed not because of the opensource project
but because the have a publicly accessible host and it was not the
opensource project that was evaluated for freedom but host server - i
seem to remember some discussion as to whether or not a new separate
list should be created for less popular hosts and self-hosted software;
but i am not sure that anything has changed in that respect
so i was surprised to read you are "helping assess gitea" - who are you
helping? when was this discussed that gitea was a candidate for evaluation?

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature