[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Rule-list] Another criterium for evaluating browsers
From: |
James |
Subject: |
Re: [Rule-list] Another criterium for evaluating browsers |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Mar 2002 10:33:43 -0800 |
updating the javascript libraries looks like a cut and paste type job. (the
ones he uses are straight from what was then the current standard Konqueror so
It should be easy.) Your request, although currently it may be beyond my
abilities, does present and intresting challenge... let me see what I can/can't
do.
James
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002 13:18:49 +0100
"Marco Fioretti"<address@hidden> wrote:
> > Marco,
> >
> > This is your article? *grin*...
>
> Yes it is... it came out of a request from LJ editor last december, and
> while writing it, and playing with mozilla, I came to think that this (and
> bookmarklets) would be a general, wonderful way to add just about
> any functionality to a browser without making it very heavy.
>
> For our purposes, adding it to a browser requiring KDE doesn't make that
> much sense, but patching dillo ( I already suggested this to its author)
> or netraider to do it would really be very useful. If you are going to
> play with netraider source code to do this, please look at this URL,
> which explains the current relevant standards.
>
> http://www.freedesktop.org/standards/desktop-entry-spec/desktop-entry-spec.html
>
> Ciao,
> Marco Fioretti
> RULE project leader
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rule-list mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/rule-list