[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Rule-list] New slinky images, copyright question
From: |
James |
Subject: |
Re: [Rule-list] New slinky images, copyright question |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Mar 2002 16:04:03 -0800 |
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 23:38:17 +0100
Martin Stricker <address@hidden> wrote and hopefully I read right:
> James wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 01:57:04 +0100
> > Martin Stricker <address@hidden> wrote and hopefully I read
right:
> >
> > > Devon wrote:
>
> > > > On another topic entirely, none of the scripts to date
included
> > > > any copyright information. Most scripts and software I've
found
> > > > anywhere contain this info.
> > > >
> > > > So, I added a copyright stanza to the top of each script,
naming
> > > > myself and the RULE project. Thoughts, comments, objections?
> > >
> > > Perfect, with one addition needed:
> > >
> > > > # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public
> > > > # License along with this program; if not, write to the Free
> > > > # Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330,
Boston,
> > > > MA 02111-1307, USA.
> > >
> > > Link to the GPL here, I think it's
http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/ ,
> > > but I'm not sure.
> >
> > Not to be a pain but may I lobby for the BSD license to be
included
> > as well. Seeing as how there is a lot of code in Linux that
comes
> > from BSD and is under that license even though people keep
slaping
> > the GPL on it (incorrectly ) for example tcl/tk webmin etc.
>
> I think the license used depends on personal taste. I prefer the
GPL
> above the BSD license because the GPL is "contagious", i. e.
anything
> derived of a GPLed software has to be under the GPL, too.
Derivates of
> BSD-style software can be proprietary and closed source. (That
nasty
> advertising clause has mostly disappeared from BSD licenses) I
don't
> want that to happen with my software - except I get paid for it.
>
Yes but like the GPL BSD prohibts changing the license on the code
to another open source license. Otherwise I could take gcc tack the
BSD license on it and call it propriatory. If the code is
originally under the BSD License it must stay under that license.
> Best regards,
> Martin Stricker
> --
> Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/
> Red Hat Linux 7.2 for low memory:
http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/rule/
> Registered Linux user #210635: http://counter.li.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rule Project HOME PAGE: http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/rule/
> Rule Development Site: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/rule/
address@hidden
> http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/rule-list
- [Rule-list] New slinky images, copyright question, Devon, 2002/03/27
- Re: [Rule-list] New slinky images, copyright question, Martin Stricker, 2002/03/27
- Re: [Rule-list] New slinky images, copyright question, Devon, 2002/03/27
- Re: [Rule-list] New slinky images, copyright question, James, 2002/03/28
- Re: [Rule-list] New slinky images, copyright question, Martin Stricker, 2002/03/28
- Re: [Rule-list] New slinky images, copyright question,
James <=
- Re: [Rule-list] New slinky images, copyright question, Martin Stricker, 2002/03/29
- Re: [Rule-list] New slinky images, copyright question, Devon, 2002/03/30