[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Savannah-hackers] Naming our sourceforge clone (was Re: Savannah an

From: Joel N. Weber II
Subject: Re: [Savannah-hackers] Naming our sourceforge clone (was Re: Savannah and non-GNU software)
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 10:43:16 -0500

   Dans un message du 23 mar à 20:40, Richard Stallman écrivait :
   > This might be a good idea.  It is short and yet expresses some of the
   > points that are useful to make.  As for the fact that we would
   > also accept some other GPL-compatible licenses, I don't think that
   > is a serious problem.  No one expects the name of a machine to
   > make precise statements about such issues--it doesn't have room.
   > The most it can do is suggest things.

   Just a question. Do we plan to accept only GPL compatible licenses or
   every free license (wrt ?

I think we should only accept GPL compatible licenses, since we'd like
all software to have GPL compatible licenses, and this might provide
people with an incentive to use a GPL compatible license where they
might otherwise not.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]