[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Savannah-hackers] Curiosity question, low priority

From: Bradley M. Kuhn
Subject: Re: [Savannah-hackers] Curiosity question, low priority
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:08:16 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.24i

Loic Dachary <address@hidden> wrote:

>       Technically speaking it means that natively private projects have
> no passwd file (hence the licensing-qa message) where natively public
> projects have a passwd file (hence the cr-reg message).
>       This discrepency has no consequence on the privacy of the project
> itself which is enforced by the permission bits at the CVSROOT
> (/cvsroot/licensing-qa and /cvsroot/cr-reg).
>       Thanks for checking and reporting this. I was not able to say
> immediately that it was normal and I had to check, which is good.

Thanks for your quick reply on something that really wasn't that urgent.

This all sounds fine to me, but it would be useful if this were documented
somewhere.  Is there a section yet in the savannah docs about "private

   -- bkuhn

Attachment: pgpXsenplwPXP.pgp
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]