savannah-hackers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Savannah-hackers] Re: Savannah sftp broken again!


From: Mathieu Roy
Subject: [Savannah-hackers] Re: Savannah sftp broken again!
Date: 17 Sep 2003 11:17:10 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3

Jonathan Walther <address@hidden> said:

> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 10:11:03AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> >The chrooted sftp access should be working for projects members now.
> 
> Mathieu, as a followup to my previous email, I did some more digging and
> have a second suggestion.
> 
> address@hidden:/upload/usr/lib> ldd sftp-server
>         libutil.so.1 => /lib/libutil.so.1 (0x4001c000)
>         libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x4001f000)
>         libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x4002f000)
>         libcrypto.so.0.9.6 => /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.6 (0x40043000)
>         libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40103000)
>         libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40220000)
>         /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
> 
> I notice that in the chroot jail, the appropriate /lib libraries are in
> place.  But the libraries in /usr/lib are not.  This may be part of the
> problem.
> 
> /usr/lib/libz.so.1
> /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.6

I changed that, hope it helps you.


Anyway, I'm able to make it working with a test account (my own
account is privileged, it works too but that's not a clue)

address@hidden ~]$ sftp -1 address@hidden:/upload
Connecting to sv.gnu.org...
Changing to: /upload
sftp> ls
drwxrwsr-x  1755 0        0           32768 Sep 17 08:03 .
drwxrwsr-x  1755 0        0           32768 Sep 17 08:03 ..
drwxrwsr-x    2 0        60897        4096 Jul 12  2002 123tkshop
drwxrwsr-x    2 0        61235        4096 Feb 20  2002 7pages
drwxrwsr-x    2 0        60865        4096 Jan  7  2003 9box
drwxrwsr-x    2 0        0            4096 Apr 20  2002 Flush
drwxrwsr-x    2 0        0            4096 Apr 2


Since I'm able to make it working on a RedHat 7.3 (with CERN specific
stuff, sure) and on a Debian testing, I think that now the problems
should be on the client side.

So -> new discussions should not be in the support tracker, with the
usual information (what software do you use, what command do you
type).



-- 
Mathieu Roy
 
  Homepage:
    http://yeupou.coleumes.org
  Not a native english speaker: 
    http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]