[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-hackers] Savannah CVS update performance...
From: |
Eric Blossom |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-hackers] Savannah CVS update performance... |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:04:53 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 02:38:30AM +0100, Vincent Caron wrote:
> Eric Blossom wrote:
> >
> >I've attached a log below. Note that there's only a single modified
> >file in the tree, tx_am.py and it's only 2KB long. I don't think your
> >problem is bandwidth, looks like something else. Taking 1:20 to
> >determine that there's a single file modified seems like about 1:10
> >too long...
>
> The same operation with the same context takes 4 sec locally on the CVS
> server, does not looks like a load limitation.
>
> It just took me a whoping 6 sec to do the same test from Paris, France.
> I'm on a regular home 512k DSL. Does not look like a bandwidth problem.
>
> I'm not sure the load and bandwidth parameters have changed a lot since
> 1 hour when you ran your test (at least in that order of magnitude : 10x
> slower according to you). Sorry, but no evidence that Savannah is at
> fault :).
OK. I just reproduced the same test on the same machine, I'm now down
to 6.3 seconds. Can you say highly variable...
Thanks for taking a look at it.
Eric