savannah-hackers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Savannah-hackers] submission of OpenPOOMA - savannah.nongnu.org


From: Richard Guenther
Subject: Re: [Savannah-hackers] submission of OpenPOOMA - savannah.nongnu.org
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:30:04 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040926)

Sylvain Beucler wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 12:38:11AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:

Sylvain Beucler wrote:

The licensing issues are cleared except for one thing: in order to
release your project properly and unambiguously under the Expat
license, please place copyright notices and permission-to-copy
statements at the beginning of every file of source code. You have to
update the license notice and add a (missing) copyright notice to each
file of the repository that is more than 10 lines long.

For more information, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html
(aimed at the GNU GPL but can be used as a basis).

So, to understand that right, at the moment every source file contains

// ACL:license
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------
// This software and ancillary information (herein called "SOFTWARE")
// called POOMA (Parallel Object-Oriented Methods and Applications) is
// made available under the terms described here.  The SOFTWARE has been
// approved for release with associated LA-CC Number LA-CC-98-65.
//
// Unless otherwise indicated, this SOFTWARE has been authored by an
// employee or employees of the University of California, operator of the
// Los Alamos National Laboratory under Contract No. W-7405-ENG-36 with
// the U.S. Department of Energy.  The U.S. Government has rights to use,
// reproduce, and distribute this SOFTWARE. The public may copy, distribute,
// prepare derivative works and publicly display this SOFTWARE without
// charge, provided that this Notice and any statement of authorship are
// reproduced on all copies.  Neither the Government nor the University
// makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any liability or
// responsibility for the use of this SOFTWARE.
//
// If SOFTWARE is modified to produce derivative works, such modified
// SOFTWARE should be clearly marked, so as not to confuse it with the
// version available from LANL.
//
// For more information about POOMA, send e-mail to address@hidden,
// or visit the POOMA web page at http://www.acl.lanl.gov/pooma/.
// ----------------------------------------------------------------------
// ACL:license

at its head.  There is no copyright notice - and if I read the license
ok, the copyright holder (in the US sense) is the U.S. Department of Energy? So I'd add

// Copyright (C) 1997-2002  U.S. Department of Energy
//
// This file is part of FreePOOMA.

to each file?


I have to admit the copyright attribution is not clear. First, it is
included in the license itself, which is unusual. Then, it says that
"The U.S. Government has rights to use, reproduce, and distribute this
SOFTWARE"; if such a statement is made, it is likely that the
U.S. Government (and hence, the U.S. Department of Energy) is not the
copyright holder of the software. So the copyright holder would be the
University of California or the Los Alamos National Laboratory, but I
am not sure at all. Do you have a way to verify which entity holds the
copyright?

I'll ask the CodeSourcery folks, they should know. It may take some time, though.

Stay tuned,

Richard.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]