[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Savannah-register-public] [task #7387] Submission of GêBR

From: Ricardo Biloti
Subject: [Savannah-register-public] [task #7387] Submission of GêBR
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:59:20 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv: Gecko/20070723 Iceweasel/ (Debian-

Follow-up Comment #4, task #7387 (project administration):

"GêBR core team" is just an alias to the authors, which are specified in
AUTHORS file. But if this is not clear or legal, I see no problem in changing

This inconsistency of licenses (GPLv2 ou v3) is mainly among distinct
subprojects (gebr, libgeoxml, gebrme, and gebrd). Again, I see no problem to
adopt GPLv3 for whole code.

About the distinction of "open source" and "free software", we tend to the
former just because, in our opinion, it seems more accurate, due to the
duality of "free" word. In principle, we agree with both, but like most the

I will discuss your suggestions and advices with my colleages, and post
another message soon.

Ricardo Biloti


Reply to this item at:


  Message sent via/by Savannah

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]