[Savannah-register-public] [task #9014] Submission of gPHPEdit

[Anoop John]

Follow-up Comment #4, task #9014 (project administration):

Thanks for pointing out the issues :-). I have already started contributing
to Free Software even before the code is on a public CVS. I have reported an
issue with the Scintilla development team and have contacted whoever had
emails in the comments sections of the files regarding the license. 

Ref:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=detail&aid=2518216&group_id=2439&atid=102439

Regarding the remaining files that do not have notices, I have filtered down
the list to the following

Autogenerated 
./config.h.in
./doc/Makefile.in
./src/Makefile.in
./Makefile.in
./pixmaps/Makefile.in
./data/Makefile.in

---- Since these are derived from GPLed files, they should be fine right?
---- I checked the source of grep and these files have similar notices in
grep as we have here.
---- I was a bit confused when you said first that they are non-trivial and
then
---- you mentioned that they are derived.

PO Files
./po/gphpedit.pot
./po/de.po
---- Both these have - "This file is distributed under the same license as
the gphpedit package."
---- Is that enough?

./po/POTFILES.in
---- Can you please take a look at ./po/Makefile.in.in and see if that is
fine.

Application Icon
./pixmaps/gphpedit.png 
---- Since this was created by the original author who released the package
under GPL, this is under GPL.
---- I have removed the other binary as it was not needed in the code. Even
otherwise it 
---- was the scintilla.so library derived from the same scintilla code base

I have uploaded the modified tarball to the same location
http://www.gphpedit.org/sites/default/files/gphpedit-0.9.91-5.tar.gz 

Thanks once again.

Cheers

Anoop


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?9014>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/