|
From: | Xiang Gao |
Subject: | [Savannah-register-public] [task #14945] Submission of Extendable Read-Only File System |
Date: | Fri, 15 Jun 2018 04:51:59 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.87 Safari/537.36 |
Follow-up Comment #18, task #14945 (project administration): Hi Ineiev, What I say is the EROFS file system _can_ be licensed as "License: GNU General Public License v2 or later", according to https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AllCompatibility And I still cannot find some words in the web pages that express "Savannah requires GPLv3+ compatibility" directly. Furthermore, there are projects(historical exceptions or what, but I could refer to archive.org to find more evidence) hosted at Savannah that use "License: GNU General Public License v2 or later" is currently actually gplv2. So I don't think there exists a strong reason that can convince me. Thanks, Gao Xiang _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?14945> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |