[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: attaching detached sessions to the current one
From: |
Joe Zbiciak |
Subject: |
Re: attaching detached sessions to the current one |
Date: |
Tue, 16 May 2006 11:21:06 -0700 (PDT) |
In my main use model, I'm multiplexed at multiple levels. I often have more
than one computer going (meaning two keyboards, two mice, two monitors). I
then usually run virtual desktop managers, giving me 4 to 6 desktops. I then
open up a bazillion xterms, because I generally prefer to have everything
visible at the same time. I then run screen only for jobs I'll want to detach
and reattach later. The wrapper concept is useful in this model for the cases
where you realize after the fact you'll want to detach and move something.
--
We sell Spatulas, and that's all!http://spatula-city.org/~im14u2c/
http://sdk-1600.spatula-city.org/
http://intyos.spatula-city.org/
----- Original Message ----
From: Eric D. Hendrickson <address@hidden>
To: Aaron Davies <address@hidden>
Cc: Joe Zbiciak <address@hidden>; address@hidden
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 12:11:26 PM
Subject: Re: attaching detached sessions to the current one
I just do everything in screen. But if you're tired of doing C-a
space to change screens, then just keep to one window in screen... ;)
(To me, if you've got more than one screen, then you've got a reason
to use screen all the time anyway...)
"Aaron Davies" <address@hidden> writes:
> Yeah, pretty much. I got tired of going "ctrl-a a a a a <space>" to
> change screens. Anyone here know the Telnet Song, by Guy Steele and
> Knuth? Screen is the modern incarnation. :-)
>
> These days, my standard .*profile finshes up with a prompt asking me
> whether I want to run screen or not, and executes it as "-R -DD" if I
> say I do.
>
> I'd certainly be happy to put a screen wrapper in my profile if it
> meant I could attach arbitrary processes.
- attaching detached sessions to the current one, Henrique Niwa, 2006/05/16
- Re: attaching detached sessions to the current one, Adam Lazur, 2006/05/16
- Re: attaching detached sessions to the current one, Michael Schroeder, 2006/05/16
- Re: attaching detached sessions to the current one, Aaron Davies, 2006/05/16
- Re: attaching detached sessions to the current one, Dave Waxman, 2006/05/16
- Re: attaching detached sessions to the current one, Joe Zbiciak, 2006/05/16
- Re: attaching detached sessions to the current one, Phil!Gregory, 2006/05/16
- Re: attaching detached sessions to the current one, Joe Zbiciak, 2006/05/16
- Re: attaching detached sessions to the current one, Aaron Davies, 2006/05/16
- Re: attaching detached sessions to the current one, Eric D. Hendrickson, 2006/05/16
- Re: attaching detached sessions to the current one,
Joe Zbiciak <=
- Re: attaching detached sessions to the current one, johnsmailinglists, 2006/05/16
- Re: attaching detached sessions to the current one, Michael Schroeder, 2006/05/16